“帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪”正当性考量——《刑法修正案九(草案)》第29条之评议

Reasonable Consideration of “Helping Cybercrime Delinquency”——Discussion about Article 29 of Criminal Law Amendment(9)

为信息网络犯罪提供帮助的行为不能因其是业务中立行为而限制其可罚性,仍应成立相关犯罪的帮助犯。《刑法修正案(九)》增设"帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪"尽管有其合理性目的,但其"帮助犯正犯化"的立法模式有悖于共犯处罚根据,导致刑法总则与分则的关系矛盾,并且其对应正犯罪名不确定,立法的妥当性存在疑问。按共犯理论处罚为网络犯罪提供帮助的行为,可以达到规制网络犯罪帮助行为的效果。

Cybercrime’s assisting behavior can’t get rid of its inculpation as neutral business behavior and who did this behavior constitutes aiding criminal for related crime. Criminal Law Amendment Draft( 9) has set up "helping cybercrime delinquency". Although there are proper purposes,this legislation mode which refers aiding criminal to principle offender is against the foundation of accomplice’s punishment,leading to conflict between general principles and specific provisions of the criminal law. Its opposite principal offender’s accusation is not certain,so there are some problems about this mode. We can also regulate cybercrime’s helping behavior according to primary joint offence theory.