关于收费权质押问题研究的文献综述

Literature Review on Research of Pledge in Charging Rights

《物权法》和《担保法》并未对收费权质押作出明确规定,仅《担保法司法解释》对'不动产收益权'质押进行了规定。根据物权法定原则,收费权质押并未得到法律的明确认可。收费权属于特殊财产,且与应收账款不同,因此收费权质押不得适用应收账款质押的相关规定;收费权可以作为质押的标的,其设立方式应当采用'书面+登记'的方式;实现收费权质权不宜采用拍卖、变卖等方式,由质权人直接控制收费权以实现其质权更有利于保护质权人的合法权益。

China’s property law and guarantee law don’t have clear provision for pledge of charging rights,only can we find provisions related in the legal interpretation in law of guarantee on real estate usufruct.According to the principle of Numerus Clausus,pledge of charging right has not been clearly recognized by law.Charging rights belongs to special property,and is different from accounts receivable,therefore,charging rights pledge shall not apply to the relevant provisions of the pledge of accounts receivable.For charging rights can be used as the subject of pledge,the establishment of which should be written with registration.The implementation of charging rights pledge should not by auction or sale,by way of directly controlling pledge of charging right is more conducive to the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of pledgee.