期刊文献+

教育水平对肥胖预防公共项目支持研究

Urban and rural residents? education level in support of public program on obesity prevention
原文传递
导出
摘要 肥胖预防公共项目旨在运用公共资金控制肥胖症的迅速增长,推进健康中国建设。城乡居民的支持是制定项目的重要因素,受到个人教育水平的影响。文章利用2015年中国综合社会调查的5 371个全国样本,根据强烈反对、反对、既不反对也不支持、支持、强烈支持5级支持程度,采用广义有序Logit模型评估公民的教育水平对项目支持的影响。研究发现,项目得到多数人的支持,教育水平起正向显著的影响,但通过年龄发挥的影响较弱,并存在城镇与是否肥胖人群的显著差异:当个人教育水平每提高一个层次,全样本反对项目的概率将降低0. 038,城镇居民强烈反对项目的概率将提高0. 018,肥胖者反对项目的概率将降低0. 227,非肥胖者强烈反对项目的概率将降低0. 016。 The public program on obesity prevention aims to control the rapid growth of obesity and to promote the construction of Healthy China by using the public funds.Urban and rural residents’support is an important factor in the development of the program,which is affected by the individual education level.According to five levels of support degree including strong opposition,opposition,neither opposition nor support,support,strong support,the generalized ordered logit model was adopted to assess the impact of residents’education level on the program support by using 5,371 national samples from the Chinese General Social Survey in 2015.It was found that the program was supported by most residents,and education level exerted significant positive effect but had weak impact by the age factor.There were significant differences among urban residents and between obese population and non-obese population,namely,if the individual education rose by one level,the probability of the whole sample opposing the program would reduce by 0.038,the probability of the urban residents strongly opposing the program would increase by 0.018,the probability of the obese population opposing the program would reduce by0.227,and the probability of the non-obese population strongly opposing the program would reduce by 0.016.
作者 黄泽颖 孙君茂 HUANG Zeying;SUN Junmao(Institute of Food and Nutrition Development,Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs,Beijing 100081,China)
出处 《中国农村卫生事业管理》 2019年第8期493-500,共8页 Chinese Rural Health Service Administration
基金 中国农业科学院科技创新工程项目(CAAS-ASTIP-2019-IFND)
关键词 教育水平 肥胖预防 公共卫生项目 民意调查 广义有序Logit模型 Education level Obesity prevention Public health program Opinion polls Generalized ordered logit model
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

  • 1马冠生,李艳平,武阳丰,翟凤英,崔朝辉,胡小琪,栾德春,胡永华,杨晓光.1992至2002年间中国居民超重率和肥胖率的变化[J].中华预防医学杂志,2005,39(5):311-315. 被引量:246
  • 2YAN-PING LI XIAO-GUANG YANG FENG-YING ZHAI JIAN-HUA PIAO WEN-HUA ZHAO JIAN ZHANG GUAN-SHENG MA.Disease Risks of Childhood Obesity in China[J].Biomedical and Environmental Sciences,2005,18(6):401-410. 被引量:70
  • 3王冰,王国华.伦敦的“交通收费”及其福利经济学解释[J].城市问题,2006(2):80-84. 被引量:11
  • 4赵文华,翟屹,胡建平,王建生,杨正雄,孔灵芝,陈春明.中国超重和肥胖造成相关慢性疾病的经济负担研究[J].中华流行病学杂志,2006,27(7):555-559. 被引量:201
  • 5Clarke,H.Targeting urban congestion:equity and second-best issues[J].Australian Economic R eview,2008,41(2):177-186.
  • 6Albalate D.,Bel G.What local policy makers should know about urban road charging:Lessons from worldwide experience[J].Public Administration R eview,2009,69(5):962-975.
  • 7Martin Gaunt,Tom R ye&Simon Allen.Public acceptability of road user charging:the case of Edinburgh and the 2005 referendum[J].Transport R eviews,2007,27(1):85-102.
  • 8Schade J.,Schlag B.Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies[J].Transportation R esearch Part F:Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,2003,6(1):45-61.
  • 9Jaensirisak S.,Wardman M.&May A.D.Explaining variations in public acceptability of road pricing schemes[J].Journal of Transport Economics and Policy,2005,(39):127-154.
  • 10Tretvik T.Urban R oad Pricing in N orway:Public Acceptability and Travel Behaviour[A].Schade J,Schlag B.Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies[C].O xford:Elsevier,2003.

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部