期刊文献+

休厄尔归纳思想研究综述 被引量:2

A Review of the Research on Whewell's Inductive Thought
原文传递
导出
摘要 休厄尔与穆勒关于归纳推理本质问题的争论贯穿了西方学界研究休厄尔归纳思想的整个历程,从时间上可分为三个阶段:(1)起步阶段,反思争论、重审批评,主要围绕经验主义与理性主义主义之争展开;(2)发展阶段,全面研究、澄清误解,着重分析假说-演绎主义与归纳主义之争;(3)新发展阶段,尝试重点研究、新视角解读"归纳"。目前这些讨论仍在进行之中,研究休厄尔的归纳思想对于我们重新认识归纳的含义、丰富归纳逻辑的研究内容以及促进认知科学的发展都具有重大的意义。 In Western academia, the debate of Whewell-Mill about the nature of inductive reasoning played an important role in the whole process of studying Whewell’s inductive thought. Chronologically, we have divided the whole process until now into three stages: In the first stage, people rethought the criticism made by Mill against Whewell in the debate between them and the reflection mainly revolved around empiricism and rationalism. Secondly, in the development stage, to clarify some misunderstandings on Whewell, the study was comprehensive and focused on the analysis of the debate between hypothetico-deductivism and inductivism. In the third stage, people have tried to interpret 'induction' from a new perspective and begun to study some new topics in Whewell’s thought. The study of this paper is of great significance for us to recognize the meaning of induction, to enrich the research content of induction logic and to promote the development of cognitive science.
作者 孟令芳 MENG Lingfang(College of Philosophy,Nankai University,Tianjin,300350)
机构地区 南开大学哲学院
出处 《自然辩证法通讯》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第2期16-23,共8页 Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金 国家社科基金重大项目"现代归纳逻辑的新发展 理论前沿与应用研究"(项目编号:15ZDB018) 教育部人文社会科学基金项目"基于模态和意向性分析的指称问题研究"(项目批准号:17YJC720017)
关键词 休厄尔 归纳逻辑 假说演绎法 协调性 William Whewell Inductivism Hypothetico-Deductive Method Consilience
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献3

共引文献2

同被引文献3

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部