期刊文献+

多点风激励下高层建筑响应分析方法 被引量:4

Response analysis methods of highrise buildings under multipoint wind excitation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以高层建筑风振响应分析方法为研究对象,推导了CQC方法和SRSS方法的计算公式;同时,特别介绍了谐波激励法(HEM),并在虚拟激励法的基础上提出了一种新的算法——谱分解法(SDM)。将这些方法用于广州西塔风振响应分析中,结果表明:CQC方法是精确算法,但计算量大;SRSS方法计算效率高于CQC方法,但会损失计算精度;HEM方法占用内存少,计算效率高;SDM方法具有和CQC方法一样的精度,但计算效率更佳。通过精度和效率的对比分析,建议在高层建筑风振响应分析中优先采用HEM方法和SDM方法。 Taking the wind-induced response analysis method of tall building as research object,this study first derived the formula of CQC and SRSS methods and introduced the harmonic excitation method(HEM).Then,spectral decomposition method(SDM) was proposed as an extension of the pseudo excitation method(PEM).All these methods were adopted in obtaining the wind-induced response of Guangzhou West Tower.The comparison results show that:the CQC method is the most accurate method but it costs more computation time.With less numerical precision,the computation efficiency of SRSS is higher than the CQC method.HEM method is proven to be effective with less internal storage.The SDM method has the same precision as the CQC method,but its computation efficiency is much better.In view of better precision and computational efficiency,it is suggested that the HEM and SDM methods should be adopted in priority for the numerical analysis of wind-induced responses of tall buildings.
出处 《自然灾害学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期66-75,共10页 Journal of Natural Disasters
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51222801 51078096) 广东省高等学校人才引进专项资金项目 广东省高等学校高层次人才项目资助
关键词 风振响应 CQC方法 SRSS方法 谐波激励法 谱分解法 wind-induced response CQC method SRSS method harmonic excitation method spectral decomposition method
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献74

共引文献155

同被引文献24

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部