论阳光司法下刑事裁判文书说理

A Study on the Reasoning of Criminal Judicial Documents under the Sunshine Justice

刑事裁判文书说理是法官为了证明定罪量刑的正当性,就定罪量刑事实认定以及法律适用等问题进行必要解释和论证的行为,它体现了贯彻刑事法治、彰显司法公信力和预防犯罪的价值。随着我国法治的进步,我国在刑事裁判文书说理水平上有了很大的提升,但是仍然存在重定罪说理轻量刑说理、二审说理优于一审说理、说理区域差别大、说理形式化的问题。当下在阳光司法背景下根据十八届三中、四中全会关于裁判文书说理的要求,刑事裁判文书说理标准上应当遵循形式与实质的统一,在说理具体方法上要丰富事实叙述方式,规范语言表达,强化逻辑论证。

The reasoning of criminal legal documents is a measure that a judge takes to explain and demonstrate the problems on the conviction of sentence facts and the application of law in order to prove the legitimacy of the conviction and sentence. It reflects the value of implementing the rule of criminal law, highlighting the credibility of the judiciary and crime prevention. Along with the progress of nomocracy in our country, the reasoning of criminal legal documents has been remarkably improved. But there are still several problems: conviction reasoning outweighs sentence reasoning; the reasoning of the second instance is better than the first instance; the reasoning varies from region to region and the reasoning becomes superfacial. Under the background of Sunshine Justice, according to the requirement of the Third and the Forth Plenary Session of the Eighteenth Session, the reasoning of criminal legal documents should follow the unity of form and essence, enrich the narrative approaches, standardize language expression and enhance logical argumentation.