对“偷换二维码案”的重新审视--兼论新类型三角诈骗的合理性

Rethinking the Case of Stealthily Replacing QR Code——The Rationality of the New Type of Triangular Fraud

"偷换二维码案"定性为盗窃罪还是诈骗罪值得探究。在被害人层面,基于民商法过错责任的内容,可认定被害人为商户。在犯罪客体层面,本案侵犯的客体是银行债权,适用盗窃罪将无法解释"移转占有"的问题,而依据传统三角诈骗理论尚难解释顾客具有处分的权限与地位。本案核心在于解释"受骗人处分自己的财产,致使被害人受损"这一情节,而新类型的三角诈骗可对此进行合理评价。

It is worth exploring whether the case of stealthily replacing QR code case should be characterized as larceny or fraud. From the aspect of victim identification,the victim can be identified as the merchant based on the view of liability for fault in violation of the obligation of review in civil and commercial law. From the aspect of criminal object,the object of this case’s infringement is the bank debt,but the application of larceny cannot explain the issue of transfer possession,while it is still difficult to explain the right and status of the customer according to the principle of traditional triangle fraud. The core of this case is to explain the fact that the dupe delivers his own property but results in the damage to the victim,which can be reasonably assessed by the new type of triangular fraud.