中国学术的基本语境与学术期刊的发稿方向

The Academic Context and Direction of Academic Publication in China

中国学术进入原创阶段需要进行前提反思与自我批判。对学术研究路径依赖的检讨,对西方学术有效性的再认识表明,中国学术的表达方式必须从我们生活的时代及时代的生活"再出发"。基于中国学术语境看学术论文的质量,包括研究层次、理论境界与学术评价问题,这是中国学术期刊编辑实践的时代要求和现实起点,同时也决定了学术期刊的发稿方向;学术期刊作为一种互动性的学术活动不能脱离评价与研究,需要在"评价体系—学术期刊—学术研究"的整体链条中确立其观察角度和判断尺度。因此,中国学术期刊应该以符合学术发展和创新规律的要求引导论文的发表,限制知识性论文,鼓励评论性论文,倡导思想性论文,激励当代中国学术话语体系的建构,扭转各种评价模式因其示范效应所加剧的思想创造衰竭的趋势。

As Chinese academia enters a new phase of original research,we need to reflect on our premises and to make self-criticism.An analysis of path dependence and the effectiveness of Western scholarship in Chinese academic research reveals that,its discourse must'start over'from realities.Evaluating the quality of Chinese academic papers in their own context in terms of level of research,theoretical vision,and system of evaluation constitutes the present requirements for and the starting point of Chinese academic publication,and also decides its direction.As a platform of interactive academic activities,the academic journal cannot separate itself from evaluation and research.Its points of view and standards should be established in the chain of evaluation system-academic journals-academic research.It should play aguiding role in promoting academic development and innovation.It should give more space to critical and insightful views while restricting merely informative ones,promote the construction of contemporary Chinese academic discourse system and change the lack of intellectual originality exacerbated by the demonstration effect of various academic evaluation systems.