期刊文献+

双柱锁定加压钢板与外固定支架在桡骨远端C型骨折治疗中的应用对比研究 被引量:2

Comparative study of double-column locking compression plate and external fixator in the treatment of type C fracture of distal radius
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析双柱锁定加压钢板与外固定支架在桡骨远端C型骨折治疗中的应用效果。方法 55例桡骨远端C型骨折手术治疗的患者,按入院时间顺序分为探究组(28例)和参照组(27例)。探究组采用双柱锁定加压钢板治疗,参照组采用外固定支架治疗。比较两组患者治疗后3个月腕关节活动度及腕关节X线测量、功能评分情况。结果两组掌倾角、尺偏角比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);探究组腕关节功能评分(4.84±2.58)分显著低于参照组的(7.53±2.84)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。探究组旋前角为(74.35±13.47)°、旋后角为(73.84±12.91)°、背伸角为(40.32±13.01)°、掌曲角为(42.06±13.64)°;参照组旋前角为(56.74±11.20)°、旋后角为(55.94±11.07)°、背伸角为(26.43±5.71)°、掌曲角为(23.75±7.43)°;探究组旋前角、旋后角、背伸角、掌曲角均大于参照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论将双柱锁定加压钢板应用于桡骨远端C型骨折治疗中效果显著,且短时间内其治疗效果优于外固定支架治疗,临床治疗时应依据患者实际情况选择手术治疗方式。 Objective To analyze the effect of double-column locking compression plate and external fixator in the treatment of type C fracture of distal radius. Methods A total of 55 patients with type C fracture of distal radius were divided by admission order into investigation group(28 cases) and control group(27 cases). The investigation group was treated with double-column locking compression plate, and the control group was treated with external fixator. The wrist joint mobility and wrist X-ray measurement and functional scores in the two groups after 3 months of treatment was compared. Results Both groups had no statistically significant difference in palm inclination and ruler deviation(P>0.05). The investigation group had significantly lower wrist joint function score as(4.84±2.58) points than(7.53±2.84) points in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The investigation group had pronation angle as(74.35±13.47)°, supination angle as(73.84±12.91)°, back extension angle as(40.32±13.01)°, palm angle as(42.06±13.64)°, which were(56.74±11.20)°,(55.94± 11.07)°,(26.43±5.71)° and(23.75±7.43)° in the control group. The investigation group had larger pronation angle, supination angle, back extension angle and palm angle than the control group, and their difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Double-column locking compression plate shows remarkable effect in treating type C fracture of distal radius, and its treatment effect is better than that of external fixator in a short time. The surgical treatment should be selected according to the actual situation of patients in clinical treatment.
作者 王绪才 屈克胜 韩振民 巩仁磊 王玉英 牛海英 WANG Xu-cai;QU Ke-sheng;HAN Zhen-min(Tai’an DongpingCounty Yinshan Health Service Center, Tai’an 271513, China)
出处 《中国实用医药》 2019年第3期15-17,共3页 China Practical Medicine
关键词 双柱锁定加压钢板 外固定支架 桡骨远端C型骨折 Double-column locking compression plate External fixator Type C fracture of distal radius
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献117

  • 1周祖彬,曾炳芳,刘闻欣,陈东,杨发民.桡尺远侧关节稳定性的解剖及临床研究[J].上海医学,2002,25(z1):13-16. 被引量:26
  • 2徐林,蔡锦方.桡骨远端关节内骨折的研究进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2004,12(18):1416-1417. 被引量:73
  • 3姜保国.桡骨远端骨折的治疗[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2006,8(3):236-239. 被引量:185
  • 4吉乐天,潘长江,单恩奇,赵文,刘亚波.半环式外固定架治疗老年桡骨远端粉碎骨折[J].实用骨科杂志,2006,12(2):153-154. 被引量:4
  • 5王满宜 杨庆铭 曾炳芳 等译.骨折治疗的AO原则[M].北京:华夏出版社,2003.221.
  • 6Michlovitz SL,LaStayo PC,Alzner S,et al.Distal radius fractures:therapy practice patterns[J].Hand Ther,2001,14(4):249-257.
  • 7Drobetz H,Kutscha-Lissberg E.Osteosynthesis of distal radial fractures with a colar locking screw plate system[J].Int Orthop,2003,27(1):1-6.
  • 8Orbay JL,Fernandez DL.Volar fixed-angle plate fixation for unstable distal radius fractures in the elderly patient[J].J Hand Surg Am,2004,29(1):96-102.
  • 9Wong KK,Chan KW,Kwok TK,et al.Volar fixation of dorsally displaced distal radial fracture using locking compression plate[J].J Orthop Surg(Hong Kong),2005,13(2):153-157.
  • 10Arora R,Lutz M,Hennerbichler A,et al.Complications following internal fixation of unstable distal radius fracture with a palmar locking plate[J].J Orthop Trauma,2007,21(5):316-322.

共引文献73

同被引文献18

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部