期刊文献+

资本压力、股权结构与商业银行监管资本套利:基于1994-2011年我国商业银行混合截面数据 被引量:3

Pressure of Capital Adequacy,Ownership Structure and Regulatory Capital Arbitrage:Based on A Pool Data of Chinese Commercial Banks from 1994-2011
原文传递
导出
摘要 监管资本套利产生于Basel协议资本监管框架的缺陷,源于经济资本与监管资本的不一致性,对金融稳定产生了重大影响,是Basel委员会不断修正Basel协议的主要原因。但现有文献对监管资本套利问题的定量研究依然有限,尚不足以揭示客观事实。本文检验了影响商业银行监管资本套利程度的主要因素,研究结果表明:第一,监管部门规定的达标要求与商业银行资本充足率之差与其监管资本套利程度正相关,说明资本压力越大套利程度越高;第二,商业银行股权结构中具有中央背景的国有股权所占比例与监管资本套利程度负相关,说明所有者与监管者的博弈性越强套利程度越高。本文将回归模型运用于监管资本套利程度的估计,具有一定创新性。 Regulatory capital arbitrage derives from the defects of the Basel Agreement's capital regulatory framework,rooted in the inconsistency between economic capital and regulatory capital,and has a significant impact on financial stability; it is the main reason for the Basel Committee constantly revising the Basel Agreement. However,quantitative study on this issue is still limited and insufficient to reveal the objective facts. This paper examines the main factors affecting the extent of commercial bank's regulatory capital arbitrage,and shows that: firstly,the difference between compliance requirements set by regulators and the commercial bank's capital adequacy ratio shows positive correlation with the extent of its regulatory capital arbitrage,which means that the greater the pressure of capital adequacy is,the higher the extent of arbitrage would be; secondly,for the ownership structure of commercial banks,the proportion of central government owned shares shows negative correlation with the extent of regulatory capital arbitrage,indicating that the stronger the struggle between owners and regulators is,the higher the extent of arbitrage would be. This paper first applies regression models to the estimates of the extent of regulatory capital arbitrage,which is an innovation.
作者 沈庆劼
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第10期56-63,共8页 Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71303169) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71171139) 国家社会科学基金青年项目(13CJY123) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(13YJC790120)
关键词 监管资本套利 资本充足率 股权结构 风险加权资本 regulatory capital arbitrage,capital adequacy ratio,ownership structure,risk-weighted assets
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献150

共引文献151

同被引文献45

  • 1李晓洁,魏巧琴.信用风险、出口信用保险和出口贸易关系的研究[J].财经研究,2010,36(5):113-122. 被引量:26
  • 2唐吉平,陈浩.贷款信用保险定价研究[J].金融研究,2004(10):77-83. 被引量:27
  • 3唐吉平,陈浩,陈德付.信贷资产组合保险策略定价研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006,23(4):118-127. 被引量:13
  • 4亚当·斯密著,唐日松译.国民财富的性质和原因的研究[M].北京:华夏出版社,2008.
  • 5Daley J., Matthews K., Whitfield K. Too-Big-To-Fail: Bank Failure and Banking Policy in Jamaica [ J ]. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 2008,18 (3):290-303.
  • 6Afonso G., Santos J., Traina J. Do "Too-Big-to-Fail" Banks Take on More Risk? [ J ]. FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 2014,20 (2) :1-18.
  • 7Duchin R., Sosyura D. Safer Ratios, Riskier Portfolios: Banks' Response to Government Aid [ J ]. Journal of Financial Econom- ics, 2014,113(1) :1-28.
  • 8Hryckiewicz A. What Do We Know About the Impact of Government Interventions in the Banking Seetor? An Assessment of Vari- ous Bailout Programs on Bank Behavior[ J ]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2014,46(9) :246-265.
  • 9Martin A. Liquidity Provision vs. Deposit Insurance: Preventing Bank Panics without Moral Hazard[ J]. Economic Theory, 2006, 28( 1 ) : 197-211.
  • 10Ngalawa H., Tchana F., Viegi N. Banking Instability and Deposit Insurance: The Role of Moral Hazard[ R]. MPRA Paper, 2011.

引证文献3

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部