期刊文献+

机构投资者异质性、投资期限与公司盈余管理 被引量:57

The Heterogeneity of Institutional Investors,the Investment Horizon and Earnings Management
原文传递
导出
摘要 从机构投资者的投资期限与上市公司的会计盈余信息关系视角,分析不同投资期限的机构投资者在公司治理中的作用。使用Gaspar等指标,把机构投资者分为长期机构投资者和短期机构投资者,利用我国上市公司2003-2011年数据,实证检验了机构投资者的投资期限对盈余管理的影响。结果发现:与预期一致,长期机构投资者的持股比例越高,越能体现其公司治理效应,即与盈余管理及正向盈余管理显著负相关;短期机构投资者比例越高,越能体现其投资的短视行为,即与盈余管理及正向盈余管理显著正相关。长期机构投资占优和短期机构投资占优分别体现其公司治理效应和信息交易效应,说明只有长期机构投资者才能参与公司治理、改善公司治理结构。因此,提高长线机构投资者的持股比例和建立长线机构投资者的激励机制才是当务之急。 This paper analyzes the role of different maturities institutional investors in corporate governance from the perspective of the relationship between investment horizon of institutional investors and accounting earnings information of listed companies. Institutional investors are classified by the methods of Gaspar et al(2006) into two types: long-term and short-term. Using the 2003- 2011 data,this paper examines what impact the investment horizon of institutional investors has on earnings management. The results show that consistent with expectations,the higher holdings proportion of long-term institutional investors,the more it can reflect the corporate governance effect; the higher holdings proportion of short-term institutional investors,the more short-sighted they are. Whether a company is dominated by long-term institutional investors or short-term institutional investors has different reflection of corporate governance effect and information transaction effect. In short,only long-term institutional investors as participants in corporate governance can improve the corporate governance structure. Therefore,increasing the stake of long- term institutional investors and creating incentives for long-term institutional investors are the top priority.
作者 罗付岩
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期174-184,共11页 Management Review
关键词 机构投资者 投资期限 盈余管理 institutional investors,investment horizon,earnings management
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Porter ME.Capital disadvantage: America’s failing capital investment system. Harvard Business . 1992
  • 2Bushee,B. J.Do Institutional Investors Prefer Near-Term Earnings over Long-Run Value?. Contemporary Accounting Research . 2001
  • 3Ping-Sheng Koh.Institutional investor type, earnings management and benchmark beaters[J].Journal of Accounting and Public Policy.2007(3)
  • 4Sunil Wahal,John J McConnell.Do institutional investors exacerbate managerial myopia?[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance . 2000 (3)
  • 5Pound J.Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight,1988.
  • 6Natasha Burns,Simi Kedia,Marc Lipson.Institutional ownership and monitoring: Evidence from financial misreporting[J].Journal of Corporate Finance.2010(4)
  • 7Chen F,Hope OK,Li Q Y,et al.Financial Reporting Quality and Investment Efficiency of Private Firms in Emerging Markets. The Accounting Review . 2011
  • 8José-Miguel Gaspar,Massimo Massa,Pedro Matos.Shareholder investment horizons and the market for corporate control[J]. Journal of Financial Economics . 2004 (1)
  • 9Ilhan Demiralp,Ranjan D’Mello,Frederik P. Schlingemann,Venkat Subramaniam.Are there monitoring benefits to institutional ownership? Evidence from seasoned equity offerings[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance . 2011 (5)
  • 10Najah Attig,Sean Cleary,Sadok El Ghoul,Omrane Guedhami.Institutional investment horizon and investment–cash flow sensitivity[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance . 2011 (4)

二级参考文献135

共引文献965

同被引文献790

引证文献57

二级引证文献427

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部