期刊文献+

公司社会责任治理:多理论融合的理论模型 被引量:15

Corporate Social Responsibility Governance: Theoretical Model of Multi-Theory Integration
原文传递
导出
摘要 全球范围内不断发生的治理失灵,促使人们积极探索新的公司治理理论以弥补代理导向的治理缺陷。研究采用演绎推理和归纳推理分析方法,在公司治理的基础理论缺陷分析基础上,探索了多理论融合的公司治理发展、识别更广泛环境影响因素的理论模型,进而提出了公司社会责任治理结构和治理要素分析框架。研究认为,将利益相关者理论、资源依赖理论和企业公民理论与代理导向的治理理论进行融合,构建的公司社会责任治理理论方法,能够弥补代理理论的治理缺陷,对社会管制政策制定和公司自治提供了理论指导。 Governance failures which occur constantly worldwide prompted scholars to explore a new corporate governance theory to compensate deficiencies of the agent-oriented governance. This research explores the theoretical analysis method from multiple theoretical perspective,constructs a much more broader theoretical model of environmental factors which integrates several theories,and further puts forward a analytical framework of corporate social responsibility governance. The research suggests that the theory of corporate social responsibility governance which integrates the stakeholder theory,resources dependency theory,corporate citizens theory and agency-oriented governance theory can offset the deficiencies of agent theory and has a theoretical guidance for government regulation policy making and internal governance of the corporation.
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期100-110,共11页 Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71463049) 教育部人文社科项目(14XJJA630001) 新疆维吾尔自治区人文社科重点基地招标项目(XJD-EU020113C08) 石河子大学高层次人才项目(RCSX201201)
关键词 公司治理 治理缺陷 多理论融合 公司社会责任治理 corporate governance,governance deficiencies,much theoretical integration,corporate social responsibility governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Stijn Claessens,B. Burcin Yurtoglu.Corporate governance in emerging markets: A survey[J].Emerging Markets Review.2012
  • 2Joe Christopher.Corporate governance—A multi-theoretical approach to recognizing the wider influencing forces impacting on organizations[J]. Critical Perspectives on Accounting . 2010 (8)
  • 3李天星,阴慧娟.药物安全性[J].中国处方药,2009,8(8):33-33. 被引量:2
  • 4Niamh M. Brennan,Jill Solomon.Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: an overview[J]. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal . 2008 (7)
  • 5Suzanne Young,Vijaya Thyil.A holistic model of corporate governance: a new research framework[J]. Corporate Governance . 2008 (1)
  • 6MASAHIKOAOKI.TOWARDS A COMPARATIVE INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS: MOTIVATIONS AND SOME TENTATIVE THEORIZING*[J]. Japanese Economic Review . 2007 (1)
  • 7ThomasClarke.Accounting for Enron: shareholder value and stakeholder interests[J]. Corporate Governance: An International Review . 2005 (5)
  • 8John Roberts,Paul Sanderson,Richard Barker,John Hendry.In the mirror of the market: The disciplinary effects of company/fund manager meetings[J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society . 2005 (3)
  • 9Michael C.Jensen.VALUE MAXIMIZATION, STAKEHOLDER THEORY, AND THE CORPORATE OBJECTIVE FUNCTION[J]. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance . 2005 (3)
  • 10Michael N. Young,David Ahlstrom,Garry D. Bruton,Eunice S. Chan.The Resource Dependence, Service and Control Functions of Boards of Directors in Hong Kong and Taiwan Residents Firms[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management . 2001 (2)

共引文献6

同被引文献229

引证文献15

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部