期刊文献+

滥用职权罪的客观要件解释

On Defining the Objective Composition of the Crime of Abusing Administrative Power
下载PDF
导出
摘要 构成滥用职权罪的行为同时具有刑法上和行政法上之双重意义。刑法意义上之"超越职权"与"行政越权"并非完全同一;"违反规定处理公务"包括行政自由裁量权的滥用与羁束权的滥用;"行政不作为"犯罪定性的关键,在于认定行为人行为时的主观心理。滥用职权罪的立法需完善,核心在于罪名分解,并注意保持刑法与行政法的协调统一。 The act of abusing administrative power has double meanings, concerning both criminal law and administrative law. We must distinguish power-exceeding in the criminal law from the exceeding of administrative power. Abusing administrative power includes abusing the discretionary power and the non-discretionary power. The administrative omission constitutes the crime ,the key lies in the actors mental state. The suggestion of legislative improvement is that the accusation should be decomposed,meanwhile , keep the coordination between criminal law and administrative law.
出处 《北华大学学报(社会科学版)》 2004年第1期78-80,F003,共4页 Journal of Beihua University(Social Sciences)
关键词 滥用职权罪 立法完善 刑法 行政法 “行政越权” “行政不作为” Abusing of administrative power Power-exceeding Discretionary power Non-discretionary power Administrative omission Legislative improvement
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献4

共引文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部