期刊文献+

Therapeutic response assessment of RFA for HCC:Contrast-enhanced US,CT and MRI 被引量:27

Therapeutic response assessment of RFA for HCC:Contrast-enhanced US,CT and MRI
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Radiofrequency ablation(RFA)is commonly applied for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)because of the facile procedure,and the safety and effectiveness for the treatment of this type of tumor.On the other hand,it is believed that HCC cells should spread predominantly through the blood flow of the portal vein,which could lead to the formation of intrahepatic micrometastases.Therefore,monitoring tumor response after the treatment is quite important and accurate assessment of treatment response is critical to obtain the most favorable outcome after the RFA.Indeed,several reports suggested that even small HCCs of≤3 cm in diameter might carry intrahepatic micrometastases and/or microvascular invasion.From this point of view,for preventing local recurrences,RFA should be performed ablating a main tumor as well as its surrounding non-tumorous liver tissue where micrometastases and microvascular invasion might exist.Recent advancement of imaging modalities such as contrast-enhanced ultrasonic,computed tomography,and magnetic resonance imaging are playing an important role on assessing the therapeutic effects of RFA.The local recurrence rate tends to be low in HCC patients who were proven to have adequate ablation margin after RFA;namely,not only disappearance of vascular enhancement of main tumor,but also an adequate ablation margin.Therefore,contrast enhancement gives important findings for the diagnosis of recurrent HCCs on each imaging.However,hyperemia of non-tumorous liver surrounding the ablated lesion,which could be attributed to an inflammation after RFA,may well obscure the findings of local recurrence of HCCs after RFA.Therefore,we need to carefully address to these imaging findings given the fact that diagnostic difficulties of local recurrence of HCC.Here,we give an overview of the current status of the imaging assessment of HCC response to RFA. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is commonly applied for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) because of the facile procedure, and the safety and effectiveness for the treatment of this type of tumor. On the other hand, it is believed that HCC cells should spread predominantly through the blood flow of the portal vein, which could lead to the formation of intrahepatic micrometastases. Therefore, monitoring tumor response after the treatment is quite important and accurate assessment of treatment response is critical to obtain the most favorable outcome after the RFA. Indeed, several reports suggested that even small HCCs of ≤ 3 cm in diameter might carry intrahepatic micrometastases and/or microvascular invasion. From this point of view, for preventing local recurrences, RFA should be performed ablating a main tumor as well as its surrounding non-tumorous liver tissue where micrometastases and microvascular invasion might exist. Recent advancement of imaging modalities such as contrast-enhanced ultrasonic, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging are playing an important role on assessing the therapeutic effects of RFA. The local recurrence rate tends to be low in HCC patients who were proven to have adequate ablation margin after RFA; namely, not only disappearance of vascular enhancement of main tumor, but also an adequate ablation margin. Therefore, contrast enhancement gives important findings for the diagnosis of recurrent HCCs on each imaging. However, hyperemia of non-tumorous liver surrounding the ablated lesion, which could be attributed to an inflammation after RFA, may well obscure the findings of local recurrence of HCCs after RFA. Therefore, we need to carefully address to these imaging findings given the fact that diagnostic difficulties of local recurrence of HCC. Here, we give an overview of the current status of the imaging assessment of HCC response to RFA.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2014年第15期4160-4166,共7页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 HEPATOCELLULAR carcinoma MICROMETASTASIS Microvasc Hepatocellular carcinoma, Micrometastasis, Microvascular invasion, Radiofrequency ablation, Safety margin
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Yasunori Minami,Masatoshi Kudo.Review of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound guidance in ablation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2011,17(45):4952-4959. 被引量:23
  • 2Masahiko Koda,Shiho Tokunaga,Kennichi Miyoshi,Manabu Kishina,Yuki Fujise,Jun Kato,Tomomitsu Matono,Yoshikazu Murawaki,Suguru Kakite,Eijiro Yamashita.Ablative margin states by magnetic resonance imaging with ferucarbotran in radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma can predict local tumor progression[J].Journal of Gastroenterology.2013(11)
  • 3Hidenori Toyoda,Takashi Kumada,Toshifumi Tada,Takuro Niinomi,Takanori Ito,Yuji Kaneoka,Atsuyuki Maeda.Prognostic significance of a combination of pre- and post-treatment tumor markers for hepatocellular carcinoma curatively treated with hepatectomy[J].Journal of Hepatology.2012(6)
  • 4Shintaro Mikami,Ryosuke Tateishi,Masaaki Akahane,Yoshinari Asaoka,Yuji Kondo,Tadashi Goto,Shuichiro Shiina,Haruhiko Yoshida,Kazuhiko Koike.Computed Tomography Follow-up for the Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence after Initial Radiofrequency Ablation: A Single-center Experience[J].Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology.2012(10)
  • 5José Campos,Claude Sirlin,Jin-Young Choi.Focal hepatic lesions in Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI: the atlas[J].Insights into Imaging.2012(5)
  • 6Yasunori Minami,Satoshi Kitai,Masatoshi Kudo.Treatment response assessment of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Usefulness of virtual CT sonography with magnetic navigation[J].European Journal of Radiology.2011(3)
  • 7Kentaroh Yamamoto,Hiroshi Imamura,Yutaka Matsuyama,Yukio Kume,Hitoshi Ikeda,Gary L. Norman,Zakera Shums,Taku Aoki,Kiyoshi Hasegawa,Yoshifumi Beck,Yasuhiko Sugawara,Norihiro Kokudo.AFP, AFP-L3, DCP, and GP73 as markers for monitoring treatment response and recurrence and as surrogate markers of clinicopathological variables of HCC[J]. Journal of Gastroenterology . 2010 (12)
  • 8Jung-Hee Yoon,Eun-Joo Lee,Seong-Sook Cha,Sang-Suk Han,Suk-Jin Choi,Jae-Ryang Juhn,Myung-Hee Kim,Yeon-Jae Lee,Seong-Jae Park.Comparison of Gadoxetic Acid–enhanced MR Imaging versus Four-phase Multi–detector Row Computed Tomography in Assessing Tumor Regression after Radiofrequency Ablation in Subjects with Hepatocellular Carcinomas[J].Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology.2010(3)
  • 9Jorge A. Marrero,Ziding Feng,Yinghui Wang,Mindie H. Nguyen,Alex S. Befeler,Lewis R. Roberts,K. Rajender Reddy,Denise Harnois,Josep M. Llovet,Daniel Normolle,Jackie Dalhgren,David Chia,Anna S. Lok,Paul D. Wagner,Sudhir Srivastava,Myron Schwartz.α-Fetoprotein, Des-γ Carboxyprothrombin, and Lectin-Bound α-Fetoprotein in Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma[J].Gastroenterology.2009(1)
  • 10Ryosuke Tateishi,Shuichiro Shiina,Takamasa Ohki,Takahisa Sato,Ryota Masuzaki,Jun Imamura,Eriko Goto,Tadashi Goto,Hideo Yoshida,Shuntaro Obi,Shinpei Sato,Fumihiko Kanai,Haruhiko Yoshida,Masao Omata.Treatment strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma: expanding the indications for radiofrequency ablation[J].Journal of Gastroenterology.2009(19)

二级参考文献4

共引文献35

同被引文献123

引证文献27

二级引证文献168

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部