期刊文献+

Multimodal imaging evaluation in staging of rectal cancer 被引量:18

Multimodal imaging evaluation in staging of rectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Rectal cancer is a common cancer and a major cause of mortality in Western countries. Accurate staging is essential for determining the optimal treatment strategies and planning appropriate surgical procedures to control rectal cancer. Endorectal ultrasonography (EUS) is suitable for assessing the extent of tumor invasion, particularly in early-stage or superficial rectal cancer cases. In advanced cases with distant metastases, computed tomography (CT) is the primary approach used to evaluate the disease. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used to assess preoperative staging and the circumferential resection margin involvement, which assists in evaluating a patient’s risk of recurrence and their optimal therapeutic strategy. Positron emission tomography (PET)-CT may be useful in detecting occult synchronous tumors or metastases at the time of initial presentation. Restaging after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remains a challenge with all modalities because it is difficult to reliably differentiate between the tumor mass and other radiation-induced changes in the images. EUS does not appear to have a useful role in post-therapeutic response assessments. Although CT is most commonly used to evaluate treatment responses, its utility for identifying and following-up metastatic lesions is limited. Preoperative high-resolution MRI in combination with diffusion-weighted imaging, and/or PET-CT could provide valuable prognostic information for rectal cancer patients with locally advanced disease receiving preoperative CRT. Based on these results, we conclude that a combination of multimodal imaging methods should be used to precisely assess the restaging of rectal cancer following CRT. Rectal cancer is a common cancer and a major cause of mortality in Western countries.Accurate staging is essential for determining the optimal treatment strategies and planning appropriate surgical procedures to control rectal cancer.Endorectal ultrasonography(EUS)is suitable for assessing the extent of tumor invasion,particularly in early-stage or superficial rectal cancer cases.In advanced cases with distant metastases,computed tomography(CT)is the primary approach used to evaluate the disease.Magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)is often used to assess preoperative staging and the circumferential resection margin involvement,which assists in evaluating a patient’s risk of recurrence and their optimal therapeutic strategy.Positron emission tomography(PET)-CT may be useful in detecting occult synchronous tumors or metastases at the time of initial presentation.Restaging after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(CRT)remains a challenge with all modalities because it is difficult to reliably differentiate between the tumor mass and other radiation-induced changes in the images.EUS does not appear to have a useful role in post-therapeutic response assessments.Although CT is most commonly used to evaluate treatment responses,its utility for identifying and following-up metastatic lesions is limited.Preoperative high-resolution MRI in combination with diffusion-weighted imaging,and/or PET-CT could provide valuable prognostic information for rectal cancer patients with locally advanced disease receiving preoperative CRT.Based on these results,we conclude that a combination of multimodal imaging methods should be used to precisely assess the restaging of rectal cancer following CRT.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2014年第15期4244-4255,共12页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by A grant(CRI 13041-22)of the Chonnam National University Hospital Research Institute of Clinical Medicine
关键词 Rectal cancer MULTIMODALITY IMAGING STAGING RESTAGING Rectal cancer Multimodality Imaging Staging Restag
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Jose M Enríquez-Navascués,Nerea Borda,Aintzane Liz-erazu,Carlos Placer,Jose L Elosegui,Juan P Ciria,Adelaida Lacasta,Luis Bujanda.Patterns of local recurrence in rectal cancer after a multidisciplinary approach[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2011,17(13):1674-1684. 被引量:14
  • 2Abdus Samee,Chelliah Ramachandran Selvasekar.Current trends in staging rectal cancer[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2011,17(7):828-834. 被引量:26
  • 3José G. Guillem,Jeannine A. Ruby,Tobias Leibold,Timothy J. Akhurst,Henry W. Yeung,Marc J. Gollub,Michelle S. Ginsberg,Jinru Shia,Arief A. Suriawinata,Elyn R. Riedel,Madhu Mazumdar,Leonard B. Saltz,Bruce D. Minsky,Garrett M. Nash,Philip B. Paty,Larissa K. Temple,Martin R. Weiser,Steven M. Larson.Neither FDG-PET Nor CT Can Distinguish Between a Pathological Complete Response and an Incomplete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Study[J].Annals of Surgery.2013(2)
  • 4Marije P. van der Paardt,Marjolein B. Zagers,Regina G. H. Beets-Tan,Jaap Stoker,Shandra Bipat.Patients Who Undergo Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Restaged by Using Diagnostic MR Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J].Radiology.2013(1)
  • 5Rebecca Siegel,Deepa Naishadham,Ahmedin Jemal.Cancer statistics, 2013[J]. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians . 2013 (1)
  • 6Vivek Gowdra Halappa,Celia Pamela Corona Villalobos,Susanne Bonekamp,Susan L. Gearhart,Jonathan Efron,Joseph Herman,Ihab R. Kamel.Rectal Imaging: Part 1, High-Resolution MRI of Carcinoma of the Rectum at 3 T[J].American Journal of Roentgenology.2012(1)
  • 7Eisar Al-Sukhni,Laurent Milot,Mark Fruitman,Joseph Beyene,J. Victor,Selina Schmocker,Gina Brown,Robin McLeod,Erin Kennedy.Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Assessment of T Category, Lymph Node Metastases, and Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement in Patients with Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J].Annals of Surgical Oncology.2012(7)
  • 8Fabio Pomerri,Salvatore Pucciarelli,Isacco Maretto,Michela Zandonà,Paola Del Bianco,Luca Amadio,Massimo Rugge,Donato Nitti,Pier C. Muzzio.Prospective assessment of imaging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer[J].Surgery.2011(1)
  • 9Jessica Evans,Uday Patel,Gina Brown.Rectal Cancer: Primary Staging and Assessment After Chemoradiotherapy[J].Seminars in Radiation Oncology.2011(3)
  • 10Harriet C.Thoeny,Brian D.Ross.Predicting and monitoring cancer treatment response with diffusion‐weighted MRI[J]. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging . 2010 (1)

二级参考文献141

  • 1Akasu T, Sugihara K, Moriya Y, Fujita S. Limitations and pitfalls of transrectal ultrasonography for staging of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40:S10-S15.
  • 2Saftoiu A, Gheonea DI. Tridimensional (3D) endoscopic ultrasound - a pictorial review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2009; 18:501-505.
  • 3Strauss LG. Fluorine-18 deoxyglucose and false-positive results: a major problem in the diagnostics of oncological patients. Eur J Nucl Med 1996; 23:1409-1415.
  • 4Cho YB, Chun HK, Kim MJ, Choi JY, Park CM, Kim BT, Lee SJ, Yun SH, Kim HC, Lee WY. Accuracy of MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT for restaging after preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. World J Surg 2009; 33:2688-2694.
  • 5Joyce DL, Wahl RL, Patel PV, Schulick RD, Gearhart SL, Choti MA. Preoperative positron emission tomography to evaluate potentially resectable hepatic colorectal metastases. Arch Surg 2006; 141: 1220-1226; discussion 1227.
  • 6Heriot AG, Hicks RJ, Drummond EG, Keck J, Mackay J, Chen F, Kalff V. Does positron emission tomography change management in primary rectal cancer? A prospective assessment. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:451-458.
  • 7Gearhart SL, Frassica D, Rosen R, Choti M, Schulick R, Wahl R. Improved staging with pretreatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography in low rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol2006; 13:397-404.
  • 8Maor Y, Nadler M, Barshack I, Zmora O, Koller M, Kundel Y, Fidder H, Bar-Meir S, Avidan B. Endoscopic ultrasound staging of rectal cancer: diagnostic value before and following chemoradiation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol2006; 21:454-458.
  • 9Denecke T, Ran B, Hoffmann KT, Hildebrandt B, Ruf J, Gutberlet M, Hunerbein M, Felix R, Wust P, Amthauer H. Comparison of CT, MRI and FDG-PET in response prediction of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after multimodal preoperative therapy: is there a benefit in using functional imaging? Eur Radiol2005; 15:1658-1666.
  • 10Kira JH, Beets GL, Kim MJ, Kessels AG, Beets-Tan RG. High- resolution MR imaging for nodal staging in rectal cancer: are there any criteria in addition to the size? Eur J Radiol 2004; 52:78-83.

共引文献163

同被引文献119

引证文献18

二级引证文献102

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部