期刊文献+

Drain amylase value as an early predictor of pancreatic fistula after cephalic duodenopancreatectomy 被引量:8

Drain amylase value as an early predictor of pancreatic fistula after cephalic duodenopancreatectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM:To determine predictors of clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas(CRPF)by measuring drain fluid amylase(DFA)in the early postoperative period.METHODS:This prospective clinical study included382 patients with periampullary tumors that were surgically resected at our department between March 2005and October 2012.A cephalic duodenopancreatectomy (DP)was performed on all patients.Two closed suction drains were placed at the end of the surgery.The highest postoperative DFA value was recorded and analyzed during the first three postoperative days and on subsequent days if the drains were kept longer.Pancreatic fistula(PF)was classified according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula(ISGPF)criteria.Postoperative complications were defined according to the Dindo-Clavien classification.All data were statistically analyzed.The optimal thresholds of DFA levels on the first,second and third postoperative days were estimated by constructing receiver operating curves,generated by calculating the sensitivities and specificities of the DFA levels.The DFA level limits were used to differentiate between the group without PF and the groups with biochemical pancreatic fistula(BPF)and CRPF.RESULTS:Pylorus-preserving duodenopancreatectomy was performed on 289(75.6%)patients,while the remaining patients underwent a classic Whipple procedure(CW).The total incidence of PF was 37.7%(grade A22.8%,grade B 11.0%and grade C 3.9%).Soft pancreatic texture(SPT)was present in 58.3%of patients who developed PF.Mortality was 4.2%.The median DFA value on the first postoperative day(DFA1)in patients who developed PF was 4520 U/L(range 350-99000 U/L)for grade A fistula(BPF)with a SPT and a diameter of the main pancreatic duct(MPD)of≤3 mm.For grade B/C(CRPF),the median DFA1 value was 8501 U/L(range377-92060 U/L)with a SPT and MPD of≤3 mm.These values were significantly higher when compared to the patients who did not have PF(122;range 5-37875 U/L).The upper limit of DFA values for the first 3 postoperative days in the examined stages of PF were:DFA1 1200U/L for the BPF and CRPF;DFA3 350 U/L for BPF and DFA3 800 U/L for CRPF.The determined values were highly significant and demonstrated a reliable diagnostic test for both BPF and CRPF.CONCLUSION:DFA1≥1200 U/L is an important predictive factor for PF of any degree.The trend of DFA3(decrease of<50%)compared to DFA1 is a significant factor in the differentiation of CRPF from transient BPF. AIM: To determine predictors of clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas (CRPF) by measuring drain fluid amylase (DFA) in the early postoperative period.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2014年第26期8691-8699,共9页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Cephalic DUODENOPANCREATECTOMY Periampullary TUMOR Cephalic duodenopancreatectomy Periampullary tumors Pancreatic fistula Drain fluid amylase level Prediction
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Justin H Nguyen.Distinguishing between parenchymal and anastomotic leakage at duct-to-mucosa pancreatic reconstruction in pancreaticoduodenectomy[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2008,14(43):6648-6654. 被引量:7
  • 2Florian Gebauer,Katja Kloth,Michael Tachezy,Yogesh K. Vashist,Guellue Cataldegirmen,Jakob R. Izbicki,Maximilliam Bockhorn.Options and Limitations in Applying the Fistula Classification by the International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula[J].Annals of Surgery.2012(1)
  • 3Robert Sutcliffe,Narendra Battula,Ali Haque,Amir Ali,Parthi Srinivasan,Simon Atkinson,Mohamed Rela,Nigel Heaton,Andreas Prachalias.Utility of Drain Fluid Amylase Measurement on the First Postoperative Day after Pancreaticoduodenectomy[J].World Journal of Surgery.2012(4)
  • 4Hiroshi Kurahara,Hiroyuki Shinchi,Kosei Maemura,Yuko Mataki,Satoshi Iino,Masahiko Sakoda,Shinichi Ueno,Sonshin Takao,Shoji Natsugoe.Indicators of Complications and Drain Removal after Pancreatoduodenectomy[J].Journal of Surgical Research.2011(2)
  • 5Claudio Bassi,Giuseppe Malleo,Paolo Pederzoli.In Reply to “Pancreatic Surgery 101. Drain, No Drain, Early Drain Removal or Late Drain Removal. What are the data? Where Do We Go From Here”[J].Annals of Surgery.2011(4)
  • 6Daniel J.Moskovic,Sally E.Hodges,Meng‐FenWu,F. CharlesBrunicardi,Susan G.Hilsenbeck,William E.Fisher.Drain data to predict clinically relevant pancreatic fistula[J].HPB.2010(7)
  • 7Claudio Bassi,Enrico Molinari,Giuseppe Malleo,Stefano Crippa,Giovanni Butturini,Roberto Salvia,Giorgio Talamini,Paolo Pederzoli.Early Versus Late Drain Removal After Standard Pancreatic Resections: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial[J].Annals of Surgery.2010(2)
  • 8Charles J. Yeo.Pancreatic Surgery 101: Drain, No Drain, Early Drain Removal, or Late Drain Removal. What Are the Data? Where Do We Go From Here?[J].Annals of Surgery.2010(2)
  • 9Andreas Schmid Frymerman,Jochen Schuld,Patrick Ziehen,Otto Kollmar,Christoph Justinger,Marco Merai,Sven Richter,Martin Karl Schilling,Mohammed Reza Moussavian.Impact of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula on Surgical Outcome—The Need for a Classification-driven Risk Management[J].Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2010(4)
  • 10David Mahvi.Defining, Controlling, and Treating a Pancreatic Fistula[J].Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2009(7)

二级参考文献1

共引文献10

同被引文献44

引证文献8

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部