摘要
Irritable bowel syndrome(IBS)remains a clinical challenge in the 21st century.It’s the most commonly diagnosed gastrointestinal condition and also the most common reason for referral to gastroenterology clinics.Its can affect up to one in five people at some point in their lives,and has a significantly impact of life quality and health care utilization.The prevalence varies according to country and criteria used to define IBS.Various mechanisms and theories have been proposed about its etiology,but the biopsychosocial model is the most currently accepted for IBS.The complex of symptoms would be the result of the interaction between psychological,behavioral,psychosocial and environmental factors.The diagnosis of IBS is not confirmed by a specific test or structural abnormality.It is made using criteria based on clinical symptoms such as Rome criteria,unless the symptoms are thought to be atypical.Today the Rome CriteriaⅢis the current goldstandard for the diagnoses of IBS.Secure positive evidence of IBS by means of specific disease marker is currently not possible and cannot be currently recommended for routine diagnosis.There is still no clinical evidence to recommend the use of biomarkers in blood to diagnose IBS.However,a number of different changes in IBS patients were demonstrated in recent years,some of which can be used in the future as a diagnostic support.IBS has no definitive treatment but could be controlled by non-pharmacologic management eliminating of some exacerbating factors such certain drugs,stressor conditions and changes in dietary habits.The traditional pharmacologic management of IBS has been symptom based and several drugs have been used.However,the cornerstone of its therapy is a solid patient physician relationship.This review will provide a summary of pathophysiology,diagnostic criteria and current and emerging therapies for IBS.
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) remains a clinical challenge in the 21<sup>st</sup> century. It’s the most commonly diagnosed gastrointestinal condition and also the most common reason for referral to gastroenterology clinics. Its can affect up to one in five people at some point in their lives, and has a significantly impact of life quality and health care utilization. The prevalence varies according to country and criteria used to define IBS. Various mechanisms and theories have been proposed about its etiology, but the biopsychosocial model is the most currently accepted for IBS. The complex of symptoms would be the result of the interaction between psychological, behavioral, psychosocial and environmental factors. The diagnosis of IBS is not confirmed by a specific test or structural abnormality. It is made using criteria based on clinical symptoms such as Rome criteria, unless the symptoms are thought to be atypical. Today the Rome Criteria III is the current gold-standard for the diagnoses of IBS. Secure positive evidence of IBS by means of specific disease marker is currently not possible and cannot be currently recommended for routine diagnosis. There is still no clinical evidence to recommend the use of biomarkers in blood to diagnose IBS. However, a number of different changes in IBS patients were demonstrated in recent years, some of which can be used in the future as a diagnostic support. IBS has no definitive treatment but could be controlled by non-pharmacologic management eliminating of some exacerbating factors such certain drugs, stressor conditions and changes in dietary habits.The traditional pharmacologic management of IBS has been symptom based and several drugs have been used. However, the cornerstone of its therapy is a solid patient physician relationship. This review will provide a summary of pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria and current and emerging therapies for IBS.
