期刊文献+

Clinicopathologic and prognostic relevance of ARID1A protein loss in colorectal cancer 被引量:8

Clinicopathologic and prognostic relevance of ARID1A protein loss in colorectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM:To explore the association between AT-rich interactive domain 1A(ARID1A)protein loss by immunohistochemistry and both clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer.METHODS:We retrospectively collected clinicopathologic data and archived paraffin-embedded primary colorectal cancer samples from 209 patients,including 111patients with colon cancer and 98 patients with rectal cancer.The tumor stage ranged from stageⅠto stageⅣaccording to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis(TNM)staging system.All patients underwent resection of primary colorectal tumors.The expression of ARID1A protein in primary colorectal cancer tissues was examined by immunohistochemical staining.The clinicopathologic association and survival relevance of ARID1A protein loss in colorectal cancer were analyzed.RESULTS:ARID1A loss by immunohistochemistry was not rare in primary colorectal cancer tumors(25.8%).There were 7.4%,24.1%,22.2%and 46.3%of patients with ARID1A loss staged at TNM stageⅠ,Ⅱ,ⅢandⅣ,respectively,compared with 20.0%,22.6%,27.7%and 29.7%of patients without ARID1A loss staged at TNM stageⅠ,Ⅱ,ⅢandⅣ,respectively.In patients with ARID1A loss,the distant metastasis rate was 46.3%.However,only 29.7%of patients without ARID1A loss were found to have distant metastasis.In terms of pathologic differentiation,there were 25.9%,66.7%and 7.4%with poorly,moderately and well differentiated tumors in patients with ARID1A loss,and 14.2%,72.3%and 13.5%with poorly,moderately and well differentiated tumors in patients without ARID1A loss,respectively.ARID1A loss was associated with late TNM stage(P=0.020),distant metastasis(P=0.026),and poor pathological classification(P=0.035).However,patients with positive ARID1A had worse overall survival compared to those with negative ARID1A in stageⅣcolorectal cancer(HR=2.49,95%CI:1.13-5.51).CONCLUSION:ARID1A protein loss is associated with clinicopathologic characteristics in colorectal cancer patients and with survival in stageⅣpatients. AIM: To explore the association between AT-rich interactive domain 1A (ARID1A) protein loss by immunohistochemistry and both clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2014年第48期18404-18412,共9页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by National High Technology Research and Development Program of China(863 Program),No.2012AA02A506 National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.81372570 the Science and Technology Foundation of Guangdong Province,China,No.2012B031800088 the Science and Technology Foundation of Guangdong Province,China,No.C2011019
关键词 AT-rich interactive domain 1A Switching defective/ AT-rich interactive domain 1A Switching defective/sucrose non-fermenting complexes Colorectal cancer Clinicopathologic characteristics Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Nawfel Mellas,Zineb Benbrahim,Omar ElMesbahi.Colorectal cancer:new developments after the 2013 ECCO/ESMO congress[J].Chinese Journal of Cancer,2014,33(4):218-221. 被引量:5
  • 2SianJones,MengLi,D. WilliamsParsons,XiaosongZhang,JelleWesseling,PetraKristel,Marjanka K.Schmidt,SanfordMarkowitz,HaiYan,DarellBigner,Ralph H.Hruban,James R.Eshleman,Christine A.Iacobuzio‐Donahue,MichaelGoggins,AnirbanMaitra,Sami N.Malek,StevePowell,BertVogelstein,Kenneth W.Kinzler,Victor E.Velculescu,NickolasPapadopoulos.Somatic mutations in the chromatin remodeling gene ARID1A occur in several tumor types[J].Hum Mutat.2011(1)
  • 3Douglas Hanahan,Robert A. Weinberg.Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation[J]. Cell . 2011 (5)

二级参考文献10

  • 1Stintzing S, Jung A, Rossius Let al. Analysis of KRAS/NRAS and BRAF mutations in FIRE-3: a randomized phase III study of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab as first-line treatment for wild-type (WT) KRAS (exon 2) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Eur J Cancer, 2013,49:S8.
  • 2Punt CJA, Simkens LHJ, May A, et al. Updated results including quality of life of the phase III CAIRO 3 study of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG): maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizurnab versus observation after induction treatment with chemotherapy and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Eur J Cancer, 2013,49:S486.
  • 3Bridgewater J, Adam R, Chau I, et al. Updated efficacy/safety findings from a randomized, phase 2 study of bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 or FOLFOXIRI in patients with initially unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (OLIVIA study). Eur J Cancer, 2013,49:S483.
  • 4Cremolini C, Loupakis F, Antoniotti C, et al. Assessing tumor response beyond RECIST criteria: early tumor shrinkage (ET8) and deepness of response (DpR) in phase III TRIBE trial by the GONO group. Eur J Cancer, 2013,49:8491.
  • 5Eric Van Cutsem, Folprecht G, Bokemeyer C, et al. Chemotherapy plus cetuximab as conversion treatment for patients with initially unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer, 2013,49:8490.
  • 6Price T, Peeters M, Kim TW, et al. ASPECCT: a randomized, multicenter, open label, phase 3 study of panitumumab vs cetuximab for previously treated wild type (WT) KRA8 metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Eur J Cancer, 2013,49:89.
  • 7Chang J, Pawar V, Grothey A, et al. Time to health status deterioration in regorafenib-treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a post-hoc analysis of the phase III CORRECT study. Eur J Cancer, 2013,49:8546.
  • 88chmoll HJ, Haustermans K, Price T, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin versus capecitabine alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: response to the local treatment after chemoradiation and surgery as secondary endpoint. Eur J Cancer, 2013,49:8482.
  • 9Sclafani F, Gonzalez D, Cunningham D, et al. TP53 status may predict benefit from cetuximab in high-risk, locally advanced rectal cancer: Results of the EXPERT-C trial. Eur J Cancer, 2013,49:84.
  • 10Church D, Domingo E, Sieber 0, et al. Evaluation of PI3KCA mutation as a predictor of benefit from NSAID therapy in colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer, 2013,49:8482.

共引文献51

同被引文献20

引证文献8

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部