期刊文献+

Prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure patients treated with artificial liver support system 被引量:17

Prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure patients treated with artificial liver support system
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To establish a new model for predicting survival in acute-on-chronic liver failure(ACLF) patients treated with an artificial liver support system. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-one ACLF patients who were admitted to the hospital from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014 and were treated with an artificial liver support system were enrolled in this retrospective study, including a derivation cohort(n = 113) and a validation cohort(n = 68). Laboratory parameters at baseline were analyzed and correlatedwith clinical outcome. In addition to standard medical therapy, ACLF patients underwent plasma exchange(PE) or plasma bilirubin adsorption(PBA) combined with plasma exchange. For the derivation cohort, KaplanMeier methods were used to estimate survival curves, and Cox regression was used in survival analysis to generate a prognostic model. The performance of the new model was tested in the validation cohort using a receiver-operator curve.RESULTS: The mean overall survival for the derivation cohort was 441 d(95%CI: 379-504 d), and the 90- and 270-d survival probabilities were 70.3% and 58.3%, respectively. The mean survival times of patients treated with PBA plus PE and patients treated with PE were 531 d(95%CI: 455-605 d) and 343 d(95%CI: 254-432 d), respectively, which were significantly different(P = 0.012). When variables with bivariate significance were selected for inclusion into the multivariate Cox regression model, number of complications, age, scores of the model for end-stage liver disease(MELD) and type of artificial liver support system were defined as independent risk factors for survival in ACLF patients. This new prognostic model could accurately discriminate the outcome of patients with different scores in this cohort(P < 0.001). The model also had the ability to assign a predicted survival probability for individual patients. In the validation cohort, the new model remained better than the MELD.CONCLUSION: A novel model was constructed to predict prognosis and accurately discriminate survival in ACLF patients treated with an artificial liver support system. AIM: To establish a new model for predicting survival in acute-on-chronic liver failure(ACLF) patients treated with an artificial liver support system. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-one ACLF patients who were admitted to the hospital from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014 and were treated with an artificial liver support system were enrolled in this retrospective study, including a derivation cohort(n = 113) and a validation cohort(n = 68). Laboratory parameters at baseline were analyzed and correlatedwith clinical outcome. In addition to standard medical therapy, ACLF patients underwent plasma exchange(PE) or plasma bilirubin adsorption(PBA) combined with plasma exchange. For the derivation cohort, KaplanMeier methods were used to estimate survival curves, and Cox regression was used in survival analysis to generate a prognostic model. The performance of the new model was tested in the validation cohort using a receiver-operator curve.RESULTS: The mean overall survival for the derivation cohort was 441 d(95%CI: 379-504 d), and the 90- and 270-d survival probabilities were 70.3% and 58.3%, respectively. The mean survival times of patients treated with PBA plus PE and patients treated with PE were 531 d(95%CI: 455-605 d) and 343 d(95%CI: 254-432 d), respectively, which were significantly different(P = 0.012). When variables with bivariate significance were selected for inclusion into the multivariate Cox regression model, number of complications, age, scores of the model for end-stage liver disease(MELD) and type of artificial liver support system were defined as independent risk factors for survival in ACLF patients. This new prognostic model could accurately discriminate the outcome of patients with different scores in this cohort(P < 0.001). The model also had the ability to assign a predicted survival probability for individual patients. In the validation cohort, the new model remained better than the MELD.CONCLUSION: A novel model was constructed to predict prognosis and accurately discriminate survival in ACLF patients treated with an artificial liver support system.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2015年第32期9614-9622,共9页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.81201107 Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China,No.2014CFB409
关键词 Acute-on-chronic LIVER FAILURE Artificial LIVER su Acute-on-chronic liver failure Artificial liver su
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Zhen Zheng,Xu Li,Zhiliang Li,Xiaochun Ma.Artificial and bioartificial liver support systems for acute and acute-on-chronichepatic failure: A meta-analysis and meta-regression[J]. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine . 2013 (4)
  • 2Kama A. Wlodzimirow,Saeid Eslami,Ameen Abu‐Hanna,Martin Nieuwoudt,Robert A. F. M. Chamuleau.A systematic review on prognostic indicators of acute on chronic liver failure and their predictive value for mortality[J]. Liver Int . 2012 (1)
  • 3Ming–Hua Zheng,Ke–Qing Shi,Yu–Chen Fan,Hai Li,Chao Ye,Qiong–Qiu Chen,Yong–Ping Chen.A Model to Determine 3-Month Mortality Risk in Patients With Acute-on-Chronic Hepatitis B Liver Failure[J]. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology . 2011 (4)
  • 4Shiv Kumar Sarin,Ashish Kumar,John A. Almeida,Yogesh Kumar Chawla,Sheung Tat Fan,Hitendra Garg,H. Janaka Silva,Saeed Sadiq Hamid,Rajiv Jalan,Piyawat Komolmit,George K. Lau,Qing Liu,Kaushal Madan,Rosmawati Mohamed,Qin Ning,Salimur Rahman,Archana Rastogi,Stephen M. Riordan,Puja Sakhuja,Didier Samuel,Samir Shah,Barjesh Chander Sharma,Praveen Sharma,Yasuhiro Takikawa,Babu Ram Thapa,Chun-Tao Wai,Man-Fung Yuen.Acute-on-chronic liver failure: consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific Association for the study of the liver (APASL)[J].Hepatology International.2009(1)
  • 5Detlef Schuppan,Nezam H Afdhal.Liver cirrhosis[J]. The Lancet . 2008 (9615)
  • 6W.B. Du,L.J. Li,J.R. Huang,Q. Yang,X.L. Liu,J. Li,Y.M. Chen,H.C. Cao,W. Xu,S.Z. Fu,Y.G. Chen.Effects of Artificial Liver Support System on Patients With Acute or Chronic Liver Failure[J]. Transplantation Proceedings . 2005 (10)
  • 7Adnan Said,John Williams,Jeremy Holden,Patrick Remington,Ronald Gangnon,Alexandru Musat,Michael R Lucey.Model for end stage liver disease score predicts mortality across a broad spectrum of liver disease[J]. Journal of Hepatology . 2004 (6)
  • 8Russell Wiesner,Erick Edwards,Richard Freeman,Ann Harper,Ray Kim,Patrick Kamath,Walter Kremers,John Lake,Todd Howard,Robert M. Merion,Robert A. Wolfe,Ruud Krom.Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers[J].Gastroenterology.2003(1)
  • 9Saeed S. Hamid,Muslim Atiq,Farooq Shehzad,Aneela Yasmeen,Tayyabun Nissa,Abdul Salam,Anwar Siddiqui,Wasim Jafri.Hepatitis E virus superinfection in patients with chronic liver disease[J]. Hepatology . 2002 (2)
  • 10Peter Ferenci,Alan Lockwood,Kevin Mullen,Ralph Tarter,Karin Weissenborn,Andres T. Blei.Hepatic encephalopathy—Definition, nomenclature, diagnosis, and quantification: Final report of the Working Party at the 11th World Congresses of Gastroenterology, Vienna, 1998[J].Hepatology.2002(3)

共引文献14

同被引文献115

引证文献17

二级引证文献161

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部