期刊文献+

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging without bowel preparation for detection of ulcerative colitis 被引量:5

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging without bowel preparation for detection of ulcerative colitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI) without bowel preparation,the optimal b value and the changes in apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) in detecting ulcerative colitis(UC).METHODS: A total of 20 patients who underwent 3T magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) without bowel preparation and colonoscopy within 24 h were recruited.Biochemical indexes,including C-reactive protein(CRP),erythrocyte sedimentation rate,hemoglobin,leucocytes,platelets,serum iron and albumin,were determined.Biochemical examinations were then performed within 24 h before or after MR colonography was conducted.DWI was performed at various b values(b = 0,400,600,800,and 1000 s/mm2).Two radiologists independently and blindly reviewed conventional- and contrast-enhanced MR images,DWI and ADC maps; these radiologists also determined ADC in each intestinal segment(rectum,sigmoid,left colon,transverse colon,and right colon).Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic performance of DWI hyperintensity from various b factors,ADC values and different radiological signs to detect endoscopic inflammation in the corresponding bowel segment.Optimal ADC threshold was estimated by maximizing the combination of sensitivity and specificity.MRfindings were correlated with endoscopic results and clinical markers; these findings were then estimated by ROC analysis.RESULTS: A total of 100 segments(71 with endoscopic colonic inflammation; 29 normal) were included.The proposed total magnetic resonance score(MR-score-T) was correlated with the total modified Baron score(Baron-T; r = 0.875,P < 0.0001); the segmental MR score(MR-score-S) was correlated with the segmental modified Baron score(Baron-S; r = 0.761,P < 0.0001).MR-score-T was correlated with clinical and biological markers of disease activity(r = 0.445 to 0.831,P < 0.05).MR-score-S > 1 corresponded to endoscopic colonic inflammation with a sensitivity of 85.9%,a specificity of 82.8% and an area under the curve(AUC) of 0.929(P < 0.0001).The accuracy of DWI hyperintensity was significantly greater at b = 800 than at b = 400,600,or 1000 s/mm2(P < 0.05) when endoscopic colonic inflammation was detected.DWI hyperintensity at b = 800 s/mm2 indicated endoscopic colonic inflammation with a sensitivity of 93.0%,a specificity of 79.3% and an AUC of 0.867(P < 0.0001).Quantitative analysis results revealed that ADC values at b = 800 s/mm2 differed significantly between endoscopic inflamed segment and normal intestinal segment(1.56 ± 0.58 mm2/s vs 2.63 ± 0.46 mm2/s,P < 0.001).The AUC of ADC values was 0.932(95% confidence interval: 0.881-0.983) when endoscopic inflammation was detected.The threshold ADC value of 2.18 × 10-3 mm2/s indicated that endoscopic inflammation differed from normal intestinal segment with a sensitivity of 89.7% and a specificity of 80.3%.CONCLUSION: DWI combined with conventional MRI without bowel preparation provides a quantitative strategy to differentiate actively inflamed intestinal segments from the normal mucosa to detect UC. AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI) without bowel preparation,the optimal b value and the changes in apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) in detecting ulcerative colitis(UC).METHODS: A total of 20 patients who underwent 3T magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) without bowel preparation and colonoscopy within 24 h were recruited.Biochemical indexes,including C-reactive protein(CRP),erythrocyte sedimentation rate,hemoglobin,leucocytes,platelets,serum iron and albumin,were determined.Biochemical examinations were then performed within 24 h before or after MR colonography was conducted.DWI was performed at various b values(b = 0,400,600,800,and 1000 s/mm2).Two radiologists independently and blindly reviewed conventional- and contrast-enhanced MR images,DWI and ADC maps; these radiologists also determined ADC in each intestinal segment(rectum,sigmoid,left colon,transverse colon,and right colon).Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic performance of DWI hyperintensity from various b factors,ADC values and different radiological signs to detect endoscopic inflammation in the corresponding bowel segment.Optimal ADC threshold was estimated by maximizing the combination of sensitivity and specificity.MRfindings were correlated with endoscopic results and clinical markers; these findings were then estimated by ROC analysis.RESULTS: A total of 100 segments(71 with endoscopic colonic inflammation; 29 normal) were included.The proposed total magnetic resonance score(MR-score-T) was correlated with the total modified Baron score(Baron-T; r = 0.875,P < 0.0001); the segmental MR score(MR-score-S) was correlated with the segmental modified Baron score(Baron-S; r = 0.761,P < 0.0001).MR-score-T was correlated with clinical and biological markers of disease activity(r = 0.445 to 0.831,P < 0.05).MR-score-S > 1 corresponded to endoscopic colonic inflammation with a sensitivity of 85.9%,a specificity of 82.8% and an area under the curve(AUC) of 0.929(P < 0.0001).The accuracy of DWI hyperintensity was significantly greater at b = 800 than at b = 400,600,or 1000 s/mm2(P < 0.05) when endoscopic colonic inflammation was detected.DWI hyperintensity at b = 800 s/mm2 indicated endoscopic colonic inflammation with a sensitivity of 93.0%,a specificity of 79.3% and an AUC of 0.867(P < 0.0001).Quantitative analysis results revealed that ADC values at b = 800 s/mm2 differed significantly between endoscopic inflamed segment and normal intestinal segment(1.56 ± 0.58 mm2/s vs 2.63 ± 0.46 mm2/s,P < 0.001).The AUC of ADC values was 0.932(95% confidence interval: 0.881-0.983) when endoscopic inflammation was detected.The threshold ADC value of 2.18 × 10-3 mm2/s indicated that endoscopic inflammation differed from normal intestinal segment with a sensitivity of 89.7% and a specificity of 80.3%.CONCLUSION: DWI combined with conventional MRI without bowel preparation provides a quantitative strategy to differentiate actively inflamed intestinal segments from the normal mucosa to detect UC.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2015年第33期9785-9792,共8页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED IMAGING APPARENT DIFFUSION coef Diffusion-weighted imaging Apparent diffusion coef
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Francesca Maccioni,Michael A. Patak,Alberto Signore,Andrea Laghi.New frontiers of MRI in Crohn’s disease: motility imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, perfusion MRI, MR spectroscopy, molecular imaging, and hybrid imaging (PET/MRI)[J]. Abdominal Imaging . 2012 (6)
  • 2Aytekin Oto,Fang Zhu,Kirti Kulkarni,Gregory S. Karczmar,Jerrold R. Turner,David Rubin.Evaluation of Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Detection of Bowel Inflammation in Patients with Crohn’s Disease[J].Academic Radiology.2009(5)
  • 3Valérie Laurent,Grégory Trausch,Olivier Bruot,Pierre Olivier,Jacques Felblinger,Denis Régent.Comparative study of two whole-body imaging techniques in the case of melanoma metastases: Advantages of multi-contrast MRI examination including a diffusion-weighted sequence in comparison with PET-CT[J].European Journal of Radiology.2009(3)
  • 4J.BELSEY,O.EPSTEIN,D.HERESBACH.Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy[J]. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics . 2006 (4)
  • 5S. M. MADSEN,H. S. THOMSEN,P. MUNKHOLM,S. DORPH,P. SCHLICHTING.Active Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis Evaluated by Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology . 1998 (11)
  • 6Lionello Gandolfi.Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopy in distinguishing the type and severity of inflammatory bowel disease[J]. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 1996 (2)
  • 7Kilickesmez Ozgur,Atilla Serhan,Soylu Aliye,Tasdelen Neslihan,Bayramoglu Sibel,Cimilli Tan,Gurmen Nevzat.Diffusion-weighted imaging of the rectosigmoid colon: preliminary findings. Journal of Computational Finance . 2009
  • 8Ozgur Kilickesmez,Aliye Soylu,Nurgul Yasar.Is quantitative diffusion-weighted MRI a reliable method in the assessment of the inflammatory activity in ulcerative colitis?. DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY . 2010
  • 9Achiam M P,L?gager V,Chabanova E,Thomsen H S,Rosenberg J.Patient acceptance of MR colonography with improved fecal tagging versus conventional colonoscopy. European Journal of Radiology . 2008
  • 10Rimola Jordi,Rodríguez Sonia,García-Bosch Orlando,Ricart Elena,Pagès Mario,Pellisé Maria,Ayuso Carmen,Panés Julián.Role of 3.0-T MR colonography in the evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc . 2009

共引文献7

同被引文献14

引证文献5

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部