期刊文献+

Stool DNA methylation assays in colorectal cancer screening 被引量:9

Stool DNA methylation assays in colorectal cancer screening
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Colorectal cancer(CRC) is fourth most common cancer in men and third in women worldwide. Developing a diagnostic panel of sensitive and specific biomarkers for the early detection of CRC is recognised as to be crucial for early initial diagnosis, which in turn leads to better long term survival. Most of the research on novel potential CRC biomarkers in the last 2 decades has been focussed on stool DNA analysis. In this paper, we describe the recent advances in non-invasive CRC screening and more specifically in molecular assays for aberrantly methylated BMP3 and NDRG4 promoter regions. In several research papers these markers showed superior rates for sensitivity and specificity in comparison to previously described assays. These tests detected the majority of adenomas ≥ 1 cm in size and the detection rates progressively increased with larger adenomas. The methylation status of the BMP3 and NDRG4 promoters demonstrated effective detection of neoplasms at all sites throughout the colon and was not affected by common clinical variables. Recently, a multitarget stool DNA test consisting of molecular assays for aberrantly methylated BMP3 and NDRG4 promoter regions, mutant KRAS and immunochemical assay for human haemoglobin has been made commercially available and is currently reimbursed in the United States. Although this is the most sensitive noninvasive CRC screening test, there is the need for further research in several areas- establishment of the best timeframe for repeated DNA stool testing; validation of the results in populations outside of North America; usefulness for surveillance and prognosis of patients; cost-effectiveness of DNA stool testing in real-life populations. Colorectal cancer(CRC) is fourth most common cancer in men and third in women worldwide. Developing a diagnostic panel of sensitive and specific biomarkers for the early detection of CRC is recognised as to be crucial for early initial diagnosis, which in turn leads to better long term survival. Most of the research on novel potential CRC biomarkers in the last 2 decades has been focussed on stool DNA analysis. In this paper, we describe the recent advances in non-invasive CRC screening and more specifically in molecular assays for aberrantly methylated BMP3 and NDRG4 promoter regions. In several research papers these markers showed superior rates for sensitivity and specificity in comparison to previously described assays. These tests detected the majority of adenomas ≥ 1 cm in size and the detection rates progressively increased with larger adenomas. The methylation status of the BMP3 and NDRG4 promoters demonstrated effective detection of neoplasms at all sites throughout the colon and was not affected by common clinical variables. Recently, a multitarget stool DNA test consisting of molecular assays for aberrantly methylated BMP3 and NDRG4 promoter regions, mutant KRAS and immunochemical assay for human haemoglobin has been made commercially available and is currently reimbursed in the United States. Although this is the most sensitive noninvasive CRC screening test, there is the need for further research in several areas- establishment of the best timeframe for repeated DNA stool testing; validation of the results in populations outside of North America; usefulness for surveillance and prognosis of patients; cost-effectiveness of DNA stool testing in real-life populations.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2015年第35期10057-10061,共5页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 COLORECTAL cancer SCREENING PROGRAMS BMP3 NDRG4 PR Colorectal cancer Screening programs BMP3,NDRG4 Pr
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Rebecca L. Siegel,Kimberly D. Miller,Ahmedin Jemal.Cancer statistics, 2015[J]. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians . 2015 (1)
  • 2John B. Kisiel,Tracy C. Yab,William R. Taylor,Douglas W. Mahoney,David A. Ahlquist.Stool Methylated DNA Markers Decrease Following Colorectal Cancer Resection—Implications for Surveillance[J]. Digestive Diseases and Sciences . 2014 (8)
  • 3E. Altobelli,A. Lattanzi,R. Paduano,G. Varassi,F. di Orio.Colorectal cancer prevention in Europe: Burden of disease and status of screening programs[J].Preventive Medicine.2014
  • 4Rebecca Siegel,Carol DeSantis,Ahmedin Jemal.Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014[J].CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.2014(2)
  • 5Graham P. Lidgard,Michael J. Domanico,Janelle J. Bruinsma,James Light,Zubin D. Gagrat,Rebecca L. Oldham-Haltom,Keith D. Fourrier,Hatim Allawi,Tracy C. Yab,Julie A. Simonson,Mary Devens,Russell I. Heigh,David A. Ahlquist,Barry M. Berger.Clinical Performance of an Automated Stool DNA Assay for Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia[J].Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2013
  • 6Yi-Chen Dai,Xiao-San Zhu,Qing-Zhen Nan,Zhang-Xin Chen,Jun-Pei Xie,Yu-Ka Fu,Yuan-Yuan Lin,Qing-Na Lian,Qiao-Fang Sang,Xiao-Juan Zhan.Identification of differential gene expressions in colorectal cancer and polyp by cDNA microarray[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2012,18(6):570-575. 被引量:4
  • 7Next-Generation Stool DNA Test Accurately Detects Colorectal Cancer and Large Adenomas[J]. Gastroenterology . 2012 (2)
  • 8Sue-Anne McLachlan,Alison Clements,Joan Austoker.Patients’ experiences and reported barriers to colonoscopy in the screening context—A systematic review of the literature[J]. Patient Education and Counseling . 2011 (2)
  • 9Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar,Amy B. Knudsen,Hermann Brenner.Cost-effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening[J]. Epidemiologic Reviews . 2011 (1)
  • 10Michael J.Duffy,Leo G. M.van Rossum,Sietze T.van Turenhout,OutiMalminiemi,CatherineSturgeon,RolfLamerz,AndreaNicolini,CajHaglund,LubosHolubec,Callum G.Fraser,Stephen P.Halloran.Use of faecal markers in screening for colorectal neoplasia: a European group on tumor markers position paper[J]. Int. J. Cancer . 2010 (1)

二级参考文献3

共引文献73

同被引文献52

引证文献9

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部