期刊文献+

Intensified intensity-modulated radiotherapy in anal cancer with prevalent HPV p16 positivity 被引量:2

Intensified intensity-modulated radiotherapy in anal cancer with prevalent HPV p16 positivity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To investigate the toxicity and response of intensity-modulated radiotherapy schedule intensified with a simultaneous integrated boost in anal canal cancer.METHODS: From March 2009 to March 2014, we retrospectively analyzed 41 consecutive patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy for anal canal squamous cell carcinoma at our center. Radiotherapy was delivered via simultaneous integrated boost(SIB) technique by helical tomotherapy, and doses were adapted to two clinical target volumes according to the tumor-nodemetastasis(TNM) stage: 50.6 Gy and 41.4 Gy in 23 fractions in T1N0, 52.8 Gy and 43.2 Gy in 24 fractionsin T2N0, and 55 Gy and 45 Gy in 25 fractions in all patients with N positive and/or ≥ T3, respectively, to planning target volumes 1 and 2. The most common chemotherapy regimen was 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-based. Human papilloma virus(HPV) p16 expression was performed by immunohistochemistry and evaluated in the majority of patients. Acute and late toxicity was scored according to CTCAe v 3.0 and RTOG scales.RESULTS: The median follow-up was 30 mo(range:12-71). Median age was 63 years(range 32-84). The stage of disease was: stage Ⅰ in 2 patients, stage Ⅱin 13 patients, stage ⅢA in 12 patients, and stage ⅢB in 14 patients, respectively. Two patients were known to be HIV positive(4.9%). HPV p16 expression status was positive in 29/34(85.3%) patients. The 4-year progression-free survival and overall survival in HPVpositive patients were 78% and 92%, respectively.Acute grade 3 skin and gastrointestinal toxicities were reported in 5% and 7.3% of patients, respectively;patients' compliance to the treatment was good due to a low occurrence of severe acute toxicity, although treatment interruptions due to toxicity were required in 7.3% of patients. At 6 mo from end of treatment,36/40(90%) patients obtained complete response;during follow-up, 5(13.8%) patients presented with disease progression(local or systemic).CONCLUSION: In our experience, intensified SIBIMRT with chemotherapy is very feasible in clinical practice, with excellent results in terms of overall survival and local control. AIM: To investigate the toxicity and response of intensity-modulated radiotherapy schedule intensified with a simultaneous integrated boost in anal canal cancer.METHODS: From March 2009 to March 2014, we retrospectively analyzed 41 consecutive patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy for anal canal squamous cell carcinoma at our center. Radiotherapy was delivered via simultaneous integrated boost(SIB) technique by helical tomotherapy, and doses were adapted to two clinical target volumes according to the tumor-nodemetastasis(TNM) stage: 50.6 Gy and 41.4 Gy in 23 fractions in T1N0, 52.8 Gy and 43.2 Gy in 24 fractionsin T2N0, and 55 Gy and 45 Gy in 25 fractions in all patients with N positive and/or ≥ T3, respectively, to planning target volumes 1 and 2. The most common chemotherapy regimen was 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-based. Human papilloma virus(HPV) p16 expression was performed by immunohistochemistry and evaluated in the majority of patients. Acute and late toxicity was scored according to CTCAe v 3.0 and RTOG scales.RESULTS: The median follow-up was 30 mo(range:12-71). Median age was 63 years(range 32-84). The stage of disease was: stage Ⅰ in 2 patients, stage Ⅱin 13 patients, stage ⅢA in 12 patients, and stage ⅢB in 14 patients, respectively. Two patients were known to be HIV positive(4.9%). HPV p16 expression status was positive in 29/34(85.3%) patients. The 4-year progression-free survival and overall survival in HPVpositive patients were 78% and 92%, respectively.Acute grade 3 skin and gastrointestinal toxicities were reported in 5% and 7.3% of patients, respectively;patients’ compliance to the treatment was good due to a low occurrence of severe acute toxicity, although treatment interruptions due to toxicity were required in 7.3% of patients. At 6 mo from end of treatment,36/40(90%) patients obtained complete response;during follow-up, 5(13.8%) patients presented with disease progression(local or systemic).CONCLUSION: In our experience, intensified SIBIMRT with chemotherapy is very feasible in clinical practice, with excellent results in terms of overall survival and local control.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2015年第37期10688-10696,共9页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 ANAL CANAL cancer INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY Anal canal cancer Intensity-modulated radiotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Carmen Stromberger,David Jann,Eva-Tessina Becker,Jan-Dirk Raguse,Ingeborg Tinhofer,Simone Marnitz,Volker Budach.Adjuvant simultaneous integrated boost IMRT for patients with intermediate- and high-risk head and neck cancer: Outcome, toxicities and patterns of failure[J]. Oral Oncology . 2014 (11)
  • 2Paola Simona Ravenda,Elena Magni,Edoardo Botteri,Michela Manzotti,Massimo Barberis,Davide Vacirca,Cristina Maria Trovato,Veronica Dell’Acqua,Maria Cristina Leonardi,Mario Sideri,Nicola Fazio,Maria Giulia Zampino.Prognostic value of human papillomavirus in anal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology . 2014 (5)
  • 3Anne Gry Bentzen,Marianne G. Guren,Barthold Vonen,Eva H. Wander?s,Gunilla Frykholm,Tom Wilsgaard,Olav Dahl,Lise Balteskard.Faecal incontinence after chemoradiotherapy in anal cancer survivors: Long-term results of a national cohort<!-- Faecal incontinence in anal cancer survivors -->[J]. Radiotherapy and Oncology . 2013
  • 4Tina Dasgupta,Diana Rothenstein,Joanne F. Chou,Zhigang Zhang,Jean L. Wright,Leonard B. Saltz,Larissa K. Temple,Philip B. Paty,Martin R. Weiser,Jose G. Guillem,Garrett M. Nash,Karyn A. Goodman.Intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional radiotherapy in the treatment of anal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score analysis<!-- IMRT vs. Conventional Pelvic RT for Anal Cancer -->[J]. Radiotherapy and Oncology . 2013 (2)
  • 5Rebecca Siegel,Deepa Naishadham,Ahmedin Jemal.Cancer statistics, 2013[J]. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians . 2013 (1)
  • 6S.G. DeFoe,S. Beriwal,H. Jones,S. Rakfal,D.E. Heron,P. Kabolizadeh,R.P. Smith,R. Lalonde.Concurrent Chemotherapy and Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for Anal Carcinoma — Clinical Outcomes in a Large National Cancer Institute-designated Integrated Cancer Centre Network[J]. Clinical Oncology . 2011 (6)
  • 7Maarten J. Deenen,Luc Dewit,Henk Boot,Jos H. Beijnen,Jan H.M. Schellens,Annemieke Cats.Simultaneous integrated boost – Intensity modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT) with concomitant capecitabine and mitomycin C for locally advanced anal carcinoma, a phase I study[J]. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics . 2012
  • 8Lisa A. Kachnic,Henry K. Tsai,John J. Coen,Lawrence S. Blaszkowsky,Kevan Hartshorn,Eunice L. Kwak,John D. Willins,David P. Ryan,Theodore S. Hong.Dose-Painted Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Anal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Report of Acute Toxicity and Response to Therapy[J]. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics . 2012 (1)
  • 9Joseph M. Pepek,Christopher G. Willett,Q. Jackie Wu,Sua Yoo,Robert W. Clough,Brian G. Czito.Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Anal Malignancies: A Preliminary Toxicity and Disease Outcomes Analysis[J]. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics . 2010 (5)
  • 10Andre Konski,Miguel Garcia,Madhu John,Richard Krieg,Wayne Pinover,Robert Myerson,Christopher Willett.Evaluation of Planned Treatment Breaks During Radiation Therapy for Anal Cancer: Update of RTOG 92-08[J]. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics . 2008 (1)

共引文献122

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部