期刊文献+

Oropharyngeal acid reflux and motility abnormalities of the proximal esophagus 被引量:5

Oropharyngeal acid reflux and motility abnormalities of the proximal esophagus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM To investigate the relationship between pathological oropharyngeal(OP) acid exposure and esophageal motility in patients with extra-esophageal syndromes.METHODS In this prospective study we enrolled consecutive outpatients with extra-esophageal symptoms suspected to be related to gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD). We enrolled only patients with a reflux symptom index(RSI) score-higher than 13 and with previous lung, allergy and ear, nose and throat evaluations excluding other specific diagnoses. All patients underwent 24-h OP pH-metry with the Dx probe and esophageal highresolution manometry(HRM). Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of a normal or pathological p H-metric finding(Ryan Score) and all manometric characteristics of the two groups were compared.RESULTS We examined 135 patients with chronic extra-esophageal syndromes. Fifty-one were considered eligible for the study. Of these, 42 decided to participate in the protocol. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of normal or pathological OP acid exposure. All the HRM parameters were compared for the two groups. Significant differences were found in the median upper esophageal sphincter resting pressure(median 71 mmH g vs 126 mmH g, P = 0.004) and the median proximal contractile integral(median 215.5 cm·mmH g·s vs 313.5 cm·mmH g·s, P = 0.039), both being lower in the group with pathological OP acid exposure, and the number of contractions with small or large breaks, which were more frequent in the same group. This group also had a larger number of peristaltic contractions with breaks in the 20 mm Hg isobaric contour(38.7% vs 15.38%, P < 0.0001).CONCLUSION In patients with suspected GERD-related extraesophageal syndromes pathological OP acid exposure was associated with weaker proximal esophageal motility. AIM To investigate the relationship between pathological oropharyngeal(OP) acid exposure and esophageal motility in patients with extra-esophageal syndromes.METHODS In this prospective study we enrolled consecutive outpatients with extra-esophageal symptoms suspected to be related to gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD). We enrolled only patients with a reflux symptom index(RSI) score-higher than 13 and with previous lung, allergy and ear, nose and throat evaluations excluding other specific diagnoses. All patients underwent 24-h OP pH-metry with the Dx probe and esophageal highresolution manometry(HRM). Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of a normal or pathological p H-metric finding(Ryan Score) and all manometric characteristics of the two groups were compared.RESULTS We examined 135 patients with chronic extra-esophageal syndromes. Fifty-one were considered eligible for the study. Of these, 42 decided to participate in the protocol. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of normal or pathological OP acid exposure. All the HRM parameters were compared for the two groups. Significant differences were found in the median upper esophageal sphincter resting pressure(median 71 mmH g vs 126 mmH g, P = 0.004) and the median proximal contractile integral(median 215.5 cm·mmH g·s vs 313.5 cm·mmH g·s, P = 0.039), both being lower in the group with pathological OP acid exposure, and the number of contractions with small or large breaks, which were more frequent in the same group. This group also had a larger number of peristaltic contractions with breaks in the 20 mm Hg isobaric contour(38.7% vs 15.38%, P < 0.0001).CONCLUSION In patients with suspected GERD-related extraesophageal syndromes pathological OP acid exposure was associated with weaker proximal esophageal motility.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2016年第40期8991-8998,共8页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 食管 活动性 Oropharyngeal 倒流 Gastroesophageal 倒流疾病 高分辨率 manometry PH-METRY Esophagus Motility Oropharyngeal reflux Gastroesophageal reflux disease High resolution manometry pH-metry
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献52

  • 1Vivek N Prachand,John C Alverdy.Gastroesophageal reflux disease and severe obesity:Fundoplication or bariatric surgery?[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(30):3757-3761. 被引量:10
  • 2Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Ga- stroenterol 2006; 101: 1900-1920; quiz 1943.
  • 3Richter JE. Extraesophageal presentations of gastroesopha- geal reflux disease: an overview. Am J Gastroentero12000; 95: S1 -S3.
  • 4Pauwels A, Blondeau K, Dupont L, Sifrim D. Cough and gastroesophageal reflux: from the gastroenterologist end. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2009; 22:135-138.
  • 5el-Scrag HB, Sonnenberg A. Cornorbid occurrence of laryn- geal or pulmonary disease with esophagitis in United States military veterans. Gastroenterology 1997; 113:755-760.
  • 6Jaspersen D, Kulig M, Labenz J, Leodolter A, Lind T, Meyer- Sabellek W, Vieth M, Willich SN, Lindner D, Stolte M, Malfertheiner P. Prevalence of extra-oesophageal manifesta- tions in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: an analysis based on the ProGERD Study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 17: 1515-1520.
  • 7Richter JE. Ear, nose and throat and respiratory manifesta- tions of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: an increasing co- nundrum. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepato12004; 16:837-845.
  • 8Vaezi MF, Hicks DM, Abelson TI, Richter JE. Laryngeal signs and symptoms and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a critical assessment of cause and effect association. Clin Gastroenterol Hepato12003; 1:333-344.
  • 9Lacy BE, Weiser K, Chertoff J, Fass R, Pandolfino JE, Richter JE, Rothstein RI, Spangler C, Vaezi MF. The diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Med 2010; 123:583-592.
  • 10Giannini EG, Zentilin P, Dulbecco P, Vigneri S, Scarlata P, Savarino V. Management strategy for patients with gastro- esophageal reflux disease: a comparison between empirical treatment with esomeprazole and endoscopy-oriented treat- ment. Am J Gastroentero12008; 103:267-275.

共引文献91

同被引文献21

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部