期刊文献+

Protocol for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it rocket science? 被引量:3

Protocol for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is it rocket science?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) does not require advanced techniques, and its performance has therefore rapidly spread worldwide. However, the rate of biliary injuries has not decreased. The concept of the critical view of safety(CVS) was first documented two decades ago. Unexpected injuries are principally due to misidentification of human factors. The surgeon's assumption is a major cause of misidentification, and a high level of experience alone is not sufficient for successful LC. We herein describe tips and pitfalls of LC in detail and discuss various technical considerations.Finally, based on a review of important papers and our own experience, we summarize the following mandatory protocol for safe LC:(1) consideration that a high level of experience alone is not enough;(2) recognition of the plateau involving the common hepatic duct and hepatic hilum;(3) blunt dissection until CVS exposure;(4) Calot's triangle clearance in the overhead view;(5) Calot's triangle clearance in the view from underneath;(6) dissection of the posterior right side of Calot's triangle;(7) removal of the gallbladder body; and(8) positive CVS exposure. We believe that adherence to this protocol will ensure successful and beneficial LC worldwide, even in patients with inflammatory changes and rare anatomies. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) does not require advanced techniques, and its performance has therefore rapidly spread worldwide. However, the rate of biliary injuries has not decreased. The concept of the critical view of safety(CVS) was first documented two decades ago. Unexpected injuries are principally due to misidentification of human factors. The surgeon’s assumption is a major cause of misidentification, and a high level of experience alone is not sufficient for successful LC. We herein describe tips and pitfalls of LC in detail and discuss various technical considerations.Finally, based on a review of important papers and our own experience, we summarize the following mandatory protocol for safe LC:(1) consideration that a high level of experience alone is not enough;(2) recognition of the plateau involving the common hepatic duct and hepatic hilum;(3) blunt dissection until CVS exposure;(4) Calot’s triangle clearance in the overhead view;(5) Calot’s triangle clearance in the view from underneath;(6) dissection of the posterior right side of Calot’s triangle;(7) removal of the gallbladder body; and(8) positive CVS exposure. We believe that adherence to this protocol will ensure successful and beneficial LC worldwide, even in patients with inflammatory changes and rare anatomies.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2016年第47期10287-10303,共17页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy GALLBLADDER Critical view of safety biliary injury PROTOCOL Laparoscopic 胆囊炎;胆囊;安全的批评看法;胆汁的损害;协议
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献35

  • 1Flum DR, Dellinger EP, Cheadle A, Chan L, Koepsell T.Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injuryduring cholecystectomy. JAMA 2003; 289: 1639-1644 [PMID:12672731 DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.13.1639].
  • 2Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. Proceedings ofCentral Social Insurance Medical Council, 2008. Accessed 26 June2009. Available from: URL: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/shingi/2009/05/s0514-6.html.
  • 3Z'graggen K, Wehrli H, Metzger A, Buehler M, Frei E, Klaiber C.Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Switzerland. Aprospective 3-year study of 10,174 patients. Swiss Association ofLaparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 1998; 12:1303-1310 [PMID: 9788852 DOI: 10.1007/s004649900846].
  • 4Fletcher DR, Hobbs MS, Tan P, Valinsky LJ, Hockey RL,Pikora TJ, Knuiman MW, Sheiner HJ, Edis A. Complications ofcholecystectomy: risks of the laparoscopic approach and protectiveeffects of operative cholangiography: a population-based study. AnnSurg 1999; 229: 449-457 [PMID: 10203075 DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199904000-00001].
  • 5Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovannini I, Ardito F, D'Acapito F, VelloneM, Murazio M, Capelli G. Bile duct injury during laparoscopiccholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56 591cholecystectomies. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 986-992 [PMID: 16230550DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.140.10.986].
  • 6Waage A, Nilsson M. Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a populationbasedstudy of 152 776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish InpatientRegistry. Arch Surg 2006; 141: 1207-1213 [PMID: 17178963 DOI:10.1001/archsurg.141.12.1207].
  • 7Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery. The 9th QuestionnaireSurvey. Accessed 26 June 2009. Available from: URL: http://www.med.oita-u.ac.jp/surgery1/JSES09/index2.html.
  • 8Flum DR, Cheadle A, Prela C, Dellinger EP, Chan L. Bileduct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in medicarebeneficiaries. JAMA 2003; 290: 2168-2173 [PMID: 14570952 DOI:10.1001/jama.290.16.2168].
  • 9Way LW, Stewart L, Gantert W, Liu K, Lee CM, Whang K, HunterJG. Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysisof 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychologyperspective. Ann Surg 2003; 237: 460-469 [PMID: 12677139 DOI:10.1097/01.SLA.0000060680.92690.E9].
  • 10Connor S, Garden OJ. Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopiccholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 158-168 [PMID: 16432812DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5266].

共引文献24

同被引文献11

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部