摘要
AIM To report early imaging assessment of ablated area post electrochemotherapy(ECT) in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer(LAPC). METHODS ECT was performed in 19 LAPC patients enrolled in an approved ongoing clinical phase Ⅰ/Ⅱ study. Before and after ECT, 18 patients underwent computed tomography(CT) scan, 11 patients underwent morphological and functional magnetic resonance(MR) scan(dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI) calculating wash-in slope(WIS) and wash-out slope(WOS); diffusion weighted imaging calculating pseudo-diffusivity(Dp), perfusion fraction(fp) and tissue diffusivity(Dt); 10 patients underwentpositron emission tomography(PET). Response evaluation criteria in solid tumour(RECIST) on MR and CT were used to assess tumour therapy response. Choi on CT, PET response criteria in solid tumors(PERCIST) on PET and functional parameters on MR were used to evaluate treatment response.RESULTS For each patient no significant reduction was measurable by CT and MR using RECIST. According Choi criteria a partial response was obtained in 18/18(100.0%) patients. According PERCIST criteria 6/10(60.0%) patients showed a partial response, 3/10(30.0%) stable disease and 1/10(10.0%) progression disease. Moreover, using functional MR parameters, a significant reduction of viable tumour after ECT can be observed. According ΔWIS and ΔWOS 9/11(81.8%) patients exhibited a partial response and 2/11(18.2%) stable disease; 8/11(72.7%) patients were considered in partial response by ΔDp evaluation and 3/11(27.3%) in stable disease; according ΔDt 7/11(63.6%) patients showed a partial response, 1/11(9.1%) showed progression of disease and 3/11(27.3%) were stable. Perfusion fraction fp showed a significant reduction after ECT only in four patients. No significant difference was observed after ECT in signal intensity of T1-weighted images and T2-weighted images, and in equilibrium-phase of contrast study, according to χ2 test was observed. A good correlation was reported between ΔHounsfield unit and Δmaximum standardized uptake value and between Δfp and ΔWOS, with a significant statistically difference(P < 0.05) using Spearman correlation coefficient.CONCLUSION Perfusion and diffusion MR derived parameters, Choi, PERCIST criteria are more performant than morphological MR and CT criteria to assess ECT treatment response.
To report early imaging assessment of ablated area post electrochemotherapy (ECT) in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). METHODSECT was performed in 19 LAPC patients enrolled in an approved ongoing clinical phase I/II study. Before and after ECT, 18 patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scan, 11 patients underwent morphological and functional magnetic resonance (MR) scan (dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI) calculating wash-in slope (WIS) and wash-out slope (WOS); diffusion weighted imaging calculating pseudo-diffusivity (Dp), perfusion fraction (fp) and tissue diffusivity (Dt); 10 patients underwent positron emission tomography (PET). Response evaluation criteria in solid tumour (RECIST) on MR and CT were used to assess tumour therapy response. Choi on CT, PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST) on PET and functional parameters on MR were used to evaluate treatment response. RESULTSFor each patient no significant reduction was measurable by CT and MR using RECIST. According Choi criteria a partial response was obtained in 18/18 (100.0%) patients. According PERCIST criteria 6/10 (60.0%) patients showed a partial response, 3/10 (30.0%) stable disease and 1/10 (10.0%) progression disease. Moreover, using functional MR parameters, a significant reduction of viable tumour after ECT can be observed. According ΔWIS and ΔWOS 9/11 (81.8%) patients exhibited a partial response and 2/11 (18.2%) stable disease; 8/11 (72.7%) patients were considered in partial response by ΔDp evaluation and 3/11 (27.3%) in stable disease; according ΔDt 7/11 (63.6%) patients showed a partial response, 1/11 (9.1%) showed progression of disease and 3/11 (27.3%) were stable. Perfusion fraction fp showed a significant reduction after ECT only in four patients. No significant difference was observed after ECT in signal intensity of T1-weighted images and T2-weighted images, and in equilibrium-phase of contrast study, according to χ<sup>2</sup> test was observed. A good correlation was reported between ΔHounsfield unit and Δmaximum standardized uptake value and between Δfp and ΔWOS, with a significant statistically difference (P < 0.05) using Spearman correlation coefficient. CONCLUSIONPerfusion and diffusion MR derived parameters, Choi, PERCIST criteria are more performant than morphological MR and CT criteria to assess ECT treatment response.
