3Osborne J. Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse. Science,2010,328(4): 463-466.
4Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M. et al.Learning to Read Scientific Text: Do Elementary School Commercial Reading Programs Help? Science Education, 2008,92(5):765-798.
5Kuhn D. Science asArgument:Implications for Teaching and Learning Scientific Thinking. Science education, 1993,77(3): 319-337.
6Driver, R., Newton, P. et al. Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms. Science Education, 2000,84 (3):287-313.
7Romberg. T. A., Carpenter, T. P. Research on Teaching and Learning Mathematics: Two Disciplines of Scientific Enquiry. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.),New York: Macmillan, 1986:605-629.
8Hake R. R. Interactive-engagement versus Traditional Methods: A Six-thousand-student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses American Journal of Physics, 1998,66(1):64-74.
9Schwarz B.B., Neuman Y., et al. Two Wrongs May Make a Right ... If They Argue Together! Cognition and Instruction, 2000,18(4):461-494.
10Ames G. J., Murray F.B. When Two Wrongs Make a Right: Promoting Cognitive Change by Social Conflict. Developmental Psychology, 1982,18(6):894-897.
