期刊文献+

是“天人合一”还是“天、地、人”三才——兼论儒家环境哲学的基本构架 被引量:12

From “Heaven-Humanity Unity”back to“Heaven-Earth-Humanity”——on the Fundamentals of Confucian Environmental Philosophy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 长期以来,中国学术界流行把儒家的基本思想乃至整个中国文化归结为"天人合一",并常常把"天人合一"的源头归结于《易经》。其实考诸中国思想史,把儒家的基本思想总结为"天人合一",特别是把"天人合一"的来源归结于《易经》的说法并不准确,是一种误导。《易经》的"天、地、人"三才思想较之于"天人合一"更为符合儒家思想的本旨。在儒家三才和谐的理念中,天、地、人三者各自都有自身的功能与价值。身为三才和谐结构中的积极参与者,人类拥有促进与维持宇宙和谐的重要责任。就环境哲学而言,儒家的"三才"说既不是"环境保护主义",也不是"自然保护主义",而且相对于大地伦理学与深层生态学等西方的整体性环境哲学而言,儒家整体性的环境哲学赋予人类在宇宙间以一个更崇高的地位和责任。 In an effort to address environmental concerns,scholars have characterized the central idea of Confucian philosophy(or Chinese philosophy)in terms of the model of"Heaven-Humanity Unity"(Tian-Ren-He-Yi).On the basis of the Yi jing,the primary text of all Confucian classics,this author argues that Confucian philosophy is best characterized in terms of the triadic model of"Heaven-Earth-Humanity"(Tian-Di-Ren).In such a reading,Confucian environmental philosophy consists of three fundamental principles:namely,the principle of Heaven,of Earth,and of Humanity.On this basis,this article outlines a blueprint for a Confucian environmental philosophy.
作者 李晨阳
出处 《周易研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第5期5-10,共6页 Studies of Zhouyi
基金 南洋理工大学研究基金(M4081062.100)
关键词 易经 天人合一 天、地、人 三才 环境哲学 Yijing heaven-humanity unity heaven earth humanity Three Powers environmental philosophy
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献6

  • 1Michael J. Puett, "Innovation as Ritualization: The Fractured Cosmology of Early China," Cardoza Law Review 28 (2006), 35.
  • 2Stephen C. Angle, Sagehood: The Contemporary Significance of Neo-Confucian Philosophy (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2009), ch.4.
  • 3Angle (2009, 214).
  • 4See generally Stephen C. Angle, 2002. Human Rights and Chinese Thought." A Cross- Cultural lnquiry (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
  • 5Daniel A. Bell, "Hierarchical Rituals for Egalitarian Societies," in China "s New Confucianism: Politics and Everyday Life in a Changing Society (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008), 38-55.
  • 6Sin Yee Chan. "Gender Relationship Roles in the Analects and the Mencius." Asian Philosophy, Vol.2, no. 1 (2000), 115-32.

共引文献1

同被引文献99

引证文献12

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部