期刊文献+

“理”在工夫过程中的柔性化诠释

The Flexibility in Interpreting the " Heavenly Principles" in the Theory of Cultivation
原文传递
导出
摘要 朱熹工夫论具有述行式的特征,工夫就是反复述行'天理'的过程。在'理'之'所当然'的方面,工夫过程可以阐述为'心具众理',以明了心对性、情的主宰;而在'所以然'的方面,由'博'至'约'即工夫由乾转坤,在忠信传习的述行中给出对'天理'的'要约'。'理'的'所以然',是其'所当然'的'要求'给出的。这种要求体现在,义与智的用刚而体柔、仁与礼的用柔而体刚的空阙之间,由诗性的柔和模拟而要约出'理''德'的新意义。述行式的工夫过程,尤其在智、仁之际的空阙处,可以对'天理'的内涵给以革新性的要约。 Similar to the theory of speech act,Zhu Xi’s(1130-1200)theory of cultivation is to perform the'heavenly principles'repeatedly.When the'heavenly principles'refers to what ought to be done in one’s speech act,the cultivating process could be interpreted as'all the principles being grasped by the heart-mind'.When the'heavenly principles'refers to the actual reason of what one ought to be done,once the cultivating process turns from Way of Qian to Way of Kun,the meaning of the'heavenly principles'is only to be given in one’s speech act if this person is performing the principles faithfully and sincerely in the repeated process.In this light,the latter reference of the'heavenly principles'lies in the'demand'of the former.This demand is embodied in one’s poetically assuming and attuning the meaning of the'heavenly principles'and the'virtues'in the chora(or place Kongque空阙)between the solid functioning of Wisdom智and Optical Appropriateness义that are actually flexible in reality,and the flexible functioning of Expedient in the Way of Acting仁and Ritual Propriety礼that are actually solid in reality.The renewed meaning of the'heavenly principles'could be given in the cultivating process,that is,one’s speech act of performing the'heavenly principles',especially in the chora between Wisdom and Expedient in the Way of Acting.
作者 王堃 WANG Kun
机构地区 中山大学哲学系
出处 《周易研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第3期95-103,共9页 Studies of Zhouyi
基金 国家社科基金青年项目:“儒家女性伦理研究”(16CZX033)
关键词 工夫过程 述行式 柔性 博约 the process of gongfu performative character of expression and practice flexibility complexity and simplicity
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献28

  • 1海德格尔.《面向思的事情》.北京:商务印书馆,1996年,第17、15、12、16、24页.
  • 2《孟子·告子上》.山西古籍出版社,2003年版第181页.
  • 3陆机.《文赋》,萧统《文选》卷17,中华书局,1977年,第239-242页.
  • 4《孔子诗论》第十六简
  • 5李学勤主编.《毛诗正义》.北京:北京大学出版社,1999年.
  • 6[美]余纪元.《德性之镜.孔子与亚里士多德的伦理学》,林航译,北京.中国人民大学出版社2009年版.
  • 7Aristotle. A Hypothetical Reconstruction of Poetics II [M]//Poetics 1, with the Tractatus Cioslinianus. trans, ty Richard Janko . Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987: 51.
  • 8宋·朱熹.诗集传序[M]//朱子全书:第1册.上海:上海古籍出版社,2002:350,350,402.
  • 9清·俞樾.苟子诗说[M]//曲园杂纂:卷六.春在堂丛书(四).光绪九年重定本:5.
  • 10[美]阿拉斯代尔·麦金太尔.《德性之后》,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1995年.

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部