制度自信视阈下的中西民族团结制度比较

A Comparison of Chinese and Western National Unity Systems from the Perspective of Institutional Self-confidence

民族团结是多民族社会发展的基础,制度通过激励机制可将民族团结机制化、结构化、规范化。世界各国为建立和保持民族团结与发展建立了人民民主、自由民主等不同的制度。从当前民族团结的实践结果来看我国的民族工作做得是最成功的,民族团结已内化为我国各民族的行为规范,相反西方式自由民主治下的民族关系矛盾日益突显。这种差异的根本原因是中西方民主制度的逻辑不同:民本社会主义与自有资本主义的不同,复合式民主与单一式民主的不同,国家中立与国家失中,和合文化与分离文化的不同。

National unity is the basis of multiethnic social development and,national unity can be mechanized,structured and standardized through an incentive mechanism system.All countries in the world have established different systems of people’s democracy and liberal democracy in order to build and maintain national unity and development.The current practice of national unity shows that China’s national work has been the most successful and national unity has been internalized as a code of conduct for all ethnic groups in China,while on the contrary,the contradiction of ethnic relations under the Western liberal democracy has been increasingly prominent.The fundamental reason for this difference lies in the logical difference between Chinese and Western democratic institutions,including the differences between people-oriented socialism and self-owned capitalism,compound democracy and single democracy,national neutrality and national failure,and harmonious culture and separated culture.