期刊文献+

染色体微阵列分析在胎儿侧脑室增宽中的应用价值 被引量:1

Chromosome microarray analysis for fetuses with ventriculomegaly
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨染色体微阵列分析技术(CMA)在检测侧脑室增宽胎儿染色体异常中的应用价值。方法收集2015年5月至2017年12月与深圳市妇幼保健院产前诊断中心就诊的50例经产前超声诊断为胎儿侧脑室增宽的患者临床资料进行回顾性分析。比较常规染色体核型分析技术和CMA技术在侧脑室增宽胎儿中染色体异常的检出率。结果 50例侧脑室增宽胎儿中,经染色体核型分析技术共检出6例异常结果,异常检出率为12%;经CMA技术共检出12例异常结果,包括全部6例染色体核型分析检出的异常结果,异常检出率为24%。经统计学分析(χ~2检验)提示,两种技术的异常检出率存在统计学差异,P=0.031。结论与常规染色体核型分析相比,染色体微阵列分析技术能够提高侧脑室增宽胎儿染色体异常的检出率,能够为侧脑室增宽胎儿的产前遗传咨询和预后评估提供更精确更全面的遗传学信息。 Objective:To investigate the clinical value of Chromosome microarray analysis used in fetuses with ventriculomegaly. Methods:Fifties fetuses who were diagnosed with ventriculomegaly by ultrasound were collected for retrospective analysis. Compare the detection rate of the chromosomal abnormality between karyotyping and chromosome microarray analysis. Results:Six abnormal results(12%)were dected by routine karyotype analysis and twelve abnormal results(24%)including Six abnormal results dected by routine karyotype analysis were dected by chromosome microarray analysis. Significant difference(P=0.031)was found in two groups by using χ~2 test. Conclusion:Compared with routine karyotype analysis,the chromosome microarray analysis can increase the abnormal detection rate of chromosomal abnormality and provide more genetic information to genetic counseling and prognostic evaluation for fetuses with ventriculomegaly.
作者 袁晖 刘洋 罗彩群 吴晓霞 耿茜 牛建民 YUAN Hui;LIU Yang;LUO Cai-qun;WU Xiao-xia;GENG Xi;NIU Jian-min(Department of Obstetrics,Shenzhen Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital,Shenzhen 518028)
出处 《中国优生与遗传杂志》 2019年第2期215-216,141,共3页 Chinese Journal of Birth Health & Heredity
关键词 染色体微阵列分析 侧脑室增宽 染色体核型分析 胎儿 Chromosome Microarray Analysis Ventriculomegaly Routine Karyotype Analysis Fetus
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1Gezer C, Ekin A, Ozeren M, et al. Chromosome abnormality incidence in fetuses with cerebral ventriculomegal[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2014 , 34(5): 387-391.
  • 2Wapner RJ, Martin CL, Levy B, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 367(23) :2175-2184.
  • 3Vergani P, Locatelli A, Strobelt N, et al. Clinical outcome ot mild fetal ventriculomegaly[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1998,178 (2) :218-222.
  • 4Riggs ER, Church DM, Hanson K, et al. Towards an evidence- based process for the clinical interpretation of copy number variation[J]. Clin Genet, 2012,81(5) :403-412.
  • 5International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics Gynecology Education Committee. Sonographic examination of the fetalcentral nervous system guidelines for performing the basic examination and the fetal neurosonogram [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2007,29(1) : 109-116.
  • 6Levitsky DB, Mack LA, Nyberg DA, et al. Fetal aqueductal stenosis diagnosed sonographically: how grave is the prognosis? [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1995,164(3):725-730.
  • 7Tugeu AU, Gulumser C, Ecevit A, et al. Prenatal evaluation and postnatal early outcomes of fetal ventriculomegaly[J]. Eur J Paediatr Neurol, 2014,18(6) : 736-740.
  • 8Senat MV, Bernard JP, Sehwirzler P, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and follow-up of 14 cases of unilateral ventrieulomegaly[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,1999,14(5) :327-332.
  • 9Goldstein I, Copel JA, Makhoul IR. Mild cerebral ventriculomegaly in fetuses characteristics and outcome [J]. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2005,20(4) : 281-284.
  • 10Madazli R, Sal V, Erenel H, et al. Characteristics and outcome of 102 fetuses with fetal cerebral ventriculomegaly: experience of a university hospital in Turkey[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2011,31 (2) :142-145.

共引文献32

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部