期刊文献+

NIPT高风险者羊水染色体核型及高通量测序全基因组拷贝变异数检测结果分析 被引量:4

Analysis of amniotic fluid karyotype and High-throughput sequencing of whole genome copy variation detection results in high-risk NIPT patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析无创产前检测(Non-invasive prenatal testing NIPT)高风险者的染色体检测结果及高通量测序全基因组拷贝变异数检测(NGS-CNVs)结果,探讨NIPT和染色体核型分析及NGS-CNVs在产前诊断中的联合应用价值。方法对73例NIPT提示阳性的孕妇行羊膜腔穿刺术,细胞培养染色体核型分析以确定胎儿染色体核型,其中45例NIPT高风险者同时行NGS-CNVs。结果 73例NIPT高风险对21三体的阳性预测值最高(85.71%),然后依次为18三体(71.43%),性染色体数目异常(65.63%),13三体(33.33%),其他染色体异常(25%)。6例NGS-CNVs与核型检测不一致,染色体核型2例9号倒位和1例平衡易位NGS-CNVs未检出;NGS-CNVs显示3例微缺失/微重复而染色体核型未检出,其中可能致病性拷贝数变异(CNVs)1例,临床意义不明的CNVs1例,多态性CNVs1例。结论 NIPT是一种有效的且无创的产前筛查手段,联合染色体核型分析及NGS-CNVs既可以检出染色体倒位和平衡易位又可以覆盖染色体微缺失或微重复,对产前诊断意义重大。 Objective:To analyze the results of chromosome detection and high-throughput sequencing of whole genome copy variation detection(NGS-CNVs)in high-risk patients with non-invasive prenatal testing(NIPT),and to explore the combined value of NIPT and karyotype analysis and NGS-CNVs in prenatal diagnosis.Methods:A total of 73 pregnant women with positive NIPT were treated with amniocentesis,and then karyotype analysis of cell culture was performed to determine the karyotype of the fetus.45 of the high-risk NIPT patients voluntarily tested CNVs simultaneously.Results:73 patients with NIPT had the highest positive predictive value for the trisomy 21(85.71%),followed by 18 trisomy(71.43%),sex chromosomes number abnormalities(65.63%),13 trisomy(33.33%),other chromosomal abnormalities(25%).Six cases of NGS-CNVs were inconsistent with karyotype detection,karyotype 2 cases of 9 th inversion and 1 case of balanced translocation NGS-CNVs were not detected;NGS-CNVs showed 3 cases of microdeletion/microrepetition and karyotype was not detected Among them,there were 1 case of pathogenic copy number variation(CNVs),1 case of CNVs with unclear clinical significance,and 1 case of benign CNVs.Conclusion:NIPT is an effective and non-invasive prenatal screening method,combined karyotype analysis and NGS-CNVs can detect both chromosomal inversions and balanced translocations,as well as chromosomal microdeletions or microduplications,which is of great significance to prenatal diagnosis.
作者 罗小芳 黄柳萍 吴海燕 张秀群 欧阳辉 LUO Xiao-fang;HUANG Liu-ping;WU Hai-yan;ZHANG Xiu-qun;OU YANG hui(Prenatal Diagnosis Center of Shunde Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital Guangdong,Foshan 528300)
出处 《中国优生与遗传杂志》 2019年第4期406-408,共3页 Chinese Journal of Birth Health & Heredity
关键词 羊膜腔穿刺 无创产前检测 核型分析 拷贝数变异 产前诊断 Amniocentesis Non-invasive prenatal testing Karyotype analysis Copy number variation Prenatal diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献19

  • 1Lo YM, Corbetta N, Chamberlain PF, et al. Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum [ J ]. Lancet, 1997,350 ( 9076 ) : 485 - 487.
  • 2Manegold-Brauer G, Kang Bellin A, Hahn S, et al. A new era in pre- natal care :non-invasive prenatal testing in Switzerland [ J ]. Swiss Med Wkly,2014,14(4) :w13915.
  • 3Taglauer ES, Wilkins-Haug L, Bianchi DW. Review: cell-free fetal DNA in the maternal circulation as an indication of placental health and dis- ease [ J ]. Placenta,2014 ;35 (4) : $64 - $68.
  • 4Smith M, Lewis KM, Holmes A, et al. A case of false negative nipt for down syndrome-lessons learned [ J ]. Case Rep Genet, 2014 (4) : 1-3.
  • 5American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics. Committee Opinion No. 545 : Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidv [ J ]. Obstet Gyneco1,2012,120 (6) : 1532 - 1534.
  • 6Devers PL, Cronister A, Ormond KE, et al. Noninvasive prenatal tes- ting/noninvasive prenatal diagnosis : the position of the National Socie- ty of Genetic Counselors [ J ]. J Genet Couns, 2013,22 ( 3 ) : 291 - 295.
  • 7Lau TK, Cheung SW, Lo PSS, et al. Non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal chromosomal abnormalities by low-coverage whole-genomes equencing of maternal plasma DNA:review of 1982 consecutive cases in a single center [ J ]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2014,43 ( 3 ) : 254 - 264.
  • 8Wapner RJ, Martin CL, Levy B, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis [ J]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 367 (12) :2175 -2184.
  • 9Shaffer LG, Dabell MP, Fisher A J, et al. Experience with microar- ray-based comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis in over 5000 pregnancies[ J]. Prenat Diagn ,2012,32 (10) :976 - 985.
  • 10Petersen OB, Vogel I, Ekelund C, et al. Potential diagnostic conse- quences of applying non-invasive prenatal testing: population-based study from a country with existing first-trlmester screening[ J]. Ultra- sound Obstet Gyneco1,2014,43 (3) :265 - 271.

共引文献31

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部