《饥饿的女儿》与《情人》的女性书写差异

The Female Writing in the Hungry Daughter and The Lover

《饥饿的女儿》和《情人》作为女性作家的自传体成长小说,有着较多的相似面:不幸的童年,缺席的父爱,在成长中的身体/精神的饥渴,这种"饥渴"的驱动迫使她们去寻找"情人"。两部作品相似面的背后隐藏着的巨大差异,折射出两位女作家在对待相似的家庭环境与叛逆的感情生活上迥异的自我定位:虹影通过六六的成长史力图证明私生子的存在是合情合理的;杜拉斯更多是通过情人来塑造一个自恋者永久接受他者膜拜的爱情神话。两位作家在鲜明的女性意识书写上彰显出迥异之美学特性:虹影之写作突破了女性作家对男性的批判与反抗,呈现出厚重的历史反思;而杜拉斯之笔触则醉心于对自我的理想化定位和对异性的征服与把控,最终呈现为女性幻想的私语表达。

The hungry daughter and the lover as female writer's autobiographical novel about growth have many similar aspects,for example,unhappy childhood,the absence of father,and the hunger in the growing bodies / spirits. And this 'hungry'drive forced them to find the 'lovers'. But there is huge difference between the two works behind these similar aspects,which reflects the two female writers' different self- image in dealing with similar family environment and the rebellious love life. Hong ying tries to prove the existence of the illegitimate child is reasonable through Liu Liu's growth. Duras is tocreate a narcissists' love myththrough the lover who has a permanent worship to her. The distinctive female consciousness writing reflecttwo writers' different aesthetic characteristics: Hong ying's writing makes a breakthrough in normal female writing which is full of criticism and resistance on man. The text brings out the heavy historical criticism; While Durasis addicted to the ideal of self- orientation,and the conquest andcontrol of man. The text finally appears as women whisper expression of fantasy.