期刊文献+

一种限定性的双层贝叶斯分类模型 被引量:44

A Restricted Double-Level Bayesian Classification Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 朴素贝叶斯分类模型是一种简单而有效的分类方法,但它的属性独立性假设使其无法表达属性变量间存在的依赖关系,影响了它的分类性能.通过分析贝叶斯分类模型的分类原则以及贝叶斯定理的变异形式,提出了一种基于贝叶斯定理的新的分类模型DLBAN(double-level Bayesian network augmented naive Bayes).该模型通过选择关键属性建立属性之间的依赖关系.将该分类方法与朴素贝叶斯分类器和TAN(tree augmented naive Bayes)分类器进行实验比较.实验结果表明,在大多数数据集上,DLBAN分类方法具有较高的分类正确率. Naive Bayes classifier is a simple and effective classification method, but its attribute independence assumption makes it unable to express the dependence among attributes, and affects its classification performance. On the basis of analyzing the classification principle of Bayesian classification model and a variant of Bayes theorem, a new classification model based on Bayes theorem, DLBAN (double-level Bayesian network augmented naive Bayes), which adds the dependence among attributes by selecting the key attributes, is proposed. DLBAN classifier is compared with Naive Bayes classifier and TAN (tree augmented naive Bayes) classifier by an experiment. Experimental results show this model has higher classification accuracy in most data sets.
出处 《软件学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2004年第2期193-199,共7页 Journal of Software
基金 国家"十五"重点科技攻关项目No.2002BA407B~~
关键词 朴素贝叶斯 TAN(tree AUGMENTED NAIVE Bayes) 叶斯定理 依赖关系 naive Bayes TAN (tree augmented naive Bayes) Bayes theorem dependence
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Friedman N,Geiger D,Goldszmidt M.Bayesian network classifiers.Machine Learning,1997,29(2-3):131-163.
  • 2Langley P,Iba W,Thompson K.An analysis of Bayesian classifiers.In:Rosenbloom P,Szolovits P,eds.Proc.of the 10th National Conf.on Artificial Intelligence.Menlo Park:AAAI Press,1992.223-228.
  • 3Kononenko I.Seminaive Bayesian classifier.In:Kodratoff Y,ed.Proc.of the 6th European Working Session on Learning.New York:Springer-Verlag,1991.206-219.
  • 4Pazzani MJ.Searching for dependencies in Bayesian classifiers.In:Fisher D,Lenz HJ,eds.Learning from Data:Artificial Intelligence and Statistics V.New York:Springer-Verlag.1996.239-248.
  • 5Langley P,Sage S.Induction of selective Bayesian classifiers.In:Mantaras RL,Poole DL,eds.Proc.of the 10th Conf.on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence.San Francisco:Morgan Kaufmann Publishers,1994.399-406.
  • 6Webb GI,Pazzani MJ.Adjusted probability naive Bayesian induction.In:Antoniou G,Slaney JK,eds.Proc.of the 11th Australian Joint Conf.on Artificial Intelligence.Berlin:Springer-Verlag,1998.285-295.
  • 7Kohavi R.Scaling up the accuracy of Naive-Bayes classifiers:A decision-tree hybrid.In:Simoudis E,Han J,Fayyad UM,eds.Proc.of the 2nd Int'l Conf.on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.Menlo Park:AAAI Press,1996.202~207.
  • 8Keogh EJ,Pazzani MJ.Learning augmented Bayesian classifiers:A comparison of distribution-based and classification-based approaches.In:Heckerman DE,Whittaker J,eds.Proc.of the Uncertainty'99:The 7th Int'l Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics.
  • 9Cheng J,Greiner R.Comparing Bayesian network classifiers.In:Laskey KB,Prade H,eds.Proc.of the 15th Conf.on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence.San Francisco:Morgan Kaufmann Publishers,1999.101-108.
  • 10Chickering DM,Geiger D,Heckerman D.Learning Bayesian networks is NP-complete.In:Fisher DH,Lenz HJ,eds.Learning from Data:Artificial Intelligence and Statistics V.New York:Springer-Verlag,1996.121-130.

共引文献1

同被引文献400

引证文献44

二级引证文献225

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部