期刊文献+

论多元融和型的儒学 被引量:1

On Confucianism with Pluralist Sources
下载PDF
导出
摘要 儒学既有静态性又有动态性,在经历了独尊儒术型、儒道互补型、三教合一型、四教会通型的四个形态的发展后,遭到“五四”以来的反孔、非孔和“尊孔”的“捧杀”三种挑战,新儒家的儒学复兴没有成功,儒学的真正出路在于吸收其他文化的精华,通过文化交流形成新的形态:“中学为体,外学为用”的多元融和型儒学,近代以来开始的这种尝试发展到现在,已经使这种形态的出现成为历史的必然和现实中的存在。 Confucianism has not only stability but also mobility. Since the May Fourth Movement, however, it faced the three challenges after it had the four styles. The renaisence of Confucianism by the contemporary Neo-Confucianism failed. The real way out of Confucianism lies in the absorption of the gist of and the exchange with other cultures to form the pluralist Confucianism, a new styled culture with Chinese learning as body and foreign learning as function. The new form becomes a historical necessity and the practical existence.
作者 蔡德贵
出处 《北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第1期124-130,共7页 Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences)
关键词 儒学 文化交流 多元化发展 Confucianism cultural exchange pluralist development
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1吴宓.孔子之价值及孔教之精义[N].大公报,1927—09-22.
  • 2梅光迪.评提倡新文化者[J].学衡,1922,(1).
  • 3记陈独秀君演讲词[J].新青年,3.
  • 4东西文明之根本异点[J].言治,.
  • 5杨深.走出东方—陈序经文化论著辑要[C].北京:中国广播电视出版社,1995..
  • 6楼宇烈.借古为今乎?恋古非今乎?—《康有为学术著作选》编后[J].书品,1989,(2).
  • 7吴宓.白璧德中西人文教育谈:编按[J].学衡,1922,(3).
  • 8吴宓.《论新文化运动》[J].学衡,1922,.
  • 9王泉根.多维视野中的吴宓[C].重庆:重庆出版社,1999..
  • 10吴宓.空轩诗话:21[A]..吴宓诗集[C].上海:中华书局,1935..

二级参考文献26

  • 1ANTONIO S. CUA, 1985. Ethical Argumentation: A Study of Hsun Tsu's Epistemology. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  • 2JOHN KNOBLOCK,1988. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete works.Vol.Ⅰ, books1-6;Vol.Ⅱ, Books7-16. Stanford: Stanford University Press.T.H.Barrett, 1992. Li Ao: Buddhist, Taoist, or Neo-Confucian? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 3PETER K. BOL, 1992. "This Culture of Ours": Intellectual Transition in T'ang and Sung China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • 4MARTINA DEUCHLER, 1992. The Confucian Transfom?tion of Korea: A Study of Society and Ideology. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • 5JERRY DENNERLIN, 1981. The Chin-ting Loyalists: Confucian Leadership and Social Change in Seventeenth Century China. New Havean: Yale University Press.
  • 6CHARLES HARTMAN, 1986. Han Yu and the T'ang Search for Unity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • 7MASAO MARUYAMA, 1974. Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan. Trans. By Mikiso Hane. Princeton and Tokyo: Princeton University Press and University of Tokyo Press.
  • 8HOYT CLEVELAND TILLMAN, 1992a. A New Direction in Confucian Scholarship: Approaches to Examing the Differences between Neo-Confu-cianism and Tao-hsueh. Philosophy East and West 42, no. 3(July 1992): 455-74.
  • 9HOYT (CLEVELAND TILLMAN, 1992b. Confucian Discourse and Chu His's Ascendancy. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  • 10KIM SUNG-HAE,1985. the Righteous and the Sage: A Comparative Study on the Ideal Images of Man in Biblical Israel and Classical China.

共引文献107

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部