也论典权制度的存废

On Reserving or Abolition of the Institution of pawning Right

分析典权的实质应从典权人和出典人两方面的角度出发,正因如此,其性质很难界定。根据我国台湾方面的经验,典权制度的弊端众多,同时基于我国国情考虑,其实用性和存在的基础已受到很大的质疑。尤其应当指出的是,典权的制度化具有产生不利后果的风险。因此在新制定的民法典中不应规定典权制度,而直接由实践来检验典权是否还适合市场经济的需要。

The analysis of the nature of pawning right should concern both the pawnor and the pawnee.For this reason,it is very difficult to define its nature. From the experience of Taiwan,there are many defects in the institution of pawning right.From the condition of our country,the utility and the basis of its exsitence have been challenged.Particularly,the institutionalization of pawning right may be very dangerous.So the conclusion of this article is:No institutionalization of pawning right in civil code.The author suggests that the pawning acts should be let alone.