期刊文献+

接触遏制与对抗遏制——克林顿政府与布什政府对朝核政策之比较 被引量:5

“Engagement Containment” and “Hawk Containment”: A Comparative Study of Clinton's and Bush's Administration's Policy towards North Korea Nuclear Issue
下载PDF
导出
摘要 冷战结束以来 ,美朝之间围绕朝鲜核问题已经发生了数次交锋。在此过程中 ,由于对外政策的主导思想和策略手段不同 ,前任克林顿政府与现任布什政府采取了截然不同的政策 :前者奉行“接触遏制”政策 ,旨在通过一定程度的妥协来换取朝鲜作出让步 ,最终达到促使其放弃核武开发的目的 ;后者则推行“对抗遏制”政策 ,力图采取对朝施加强大压力来迫使朝鲜完全屈从美国的意志。政策手段的不同 。 Since the end of the Cold War, there have been continuous conflicts between the United States and North Korea over the nuclear issue. In coping with these crises, the two consecutive American administrations, one under Clinton and the other under Bush, took greatly different approaches owing to the change of foreign policy ideology as well as external security environment: The former adopted what may be called 'engagement containment ' with a view of urging North Korea to recede from its nuclear ambitions by means of some sort of compromise, while the latter pursues what can be termed as “hawk containment”aiming to force its adversary to subjugate itself totally to the American will through tough coercion. Different policies resulted in different consequences.
出处 《国际论坛》 CSSCI 2004年第1期25-28,共4页 International Forum
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1马辉.美国在朝核问题上意欲何为[J].当代世界,2003(3):7-9. 被引量:2
  • 2翟晓敏.《冷战后的美国军事战略》[M].国防大学出版社,1999年版.第2页.
  • 3安洪泉.调整中的美国对朝鲜政策[J].现代国际关系,1999(7):24-25. 被引量:2
  • 4Washington Post,Nov,19th,2002,.
  • 5.路透社华盛顿,2003年1月7日电[N].,.
  • 6Philip Shenon, “North Korea Says Nuclear Prcgram Can Be Negotiated” , New York Times, November 3, 2002.
  • 7.[N].[日]《朝日新闻》,2002年4月17日.

共引文献7

同被引文献54

引证文献5

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部