对“重建个人所有制”不同解释的评析

Comment on Different Interpretations of Reconstruction of Individual Ownership

生产资料社会主义公有制代替资本主义私有制是历史的必然，在生产资料社会主义公有制的基础上重新建立起来的个人所有制，它的内涵只能是生活资料，而不可能是生产资料公有制基础上的生产资料公有制或集体所有制或联合起来的个人所有制这样的同义反复，也不可能是私有制，因为马克思已经明确指出“不是重新建立私有制”。从劳动者同生产资料的结合、分离、更高形式的结合上可以解开所谓的“辩证法之迷”。即生产发展的必然规律同否定之否定规律的一致性。生活资料个人所有制是人类生存的最基本物质条件，也是人们生存、享受和发展的平等权利保证和实现社会主义生产目的的客观要求。

It is inevitable that socialist public ownership of means of production will substitute capitalist private ownership. The connotation of individual ownership reconstructed on the basis of public ownership can only cover means of subsistence.It is neither public ownership of means of production nor collective ownership, nor individuals' joint ownership, nor private ownership because Marx has clearly declared: 'It is not reconstruction of private ownership.' According to the combination, separation and superior combination of labourer and means of production, the so-called'dialectical puzzle' can be settled, that is, the inexorable law of the development of production and the law of the negation of negation are identical. Individual ownership of means of subsistence is one of the basic conditions for human being's subsistence. It's also a guarantee for people to enjoy their life and make self development and an objective requirement of realizing socialist productive aim.