期刊文献+

保留肾单位手术治疗早期肾癌的长期疗效观察 被引量:3

Long-term efficiency of nephron sparing surgery for early-stage renal cell carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨保留肾单位手术治疗早期肾癌的临床应用价值。方法 :对采取保留肾单位手术治疗的2 3例孤立肾或对侧肾功能不全的早期肾癌临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果 :术后均未发生严重并发症 ,术后病理均为T1a期 ,其中透明细胞癌 19例 ,嫌色细胞癌 2例 ,乳头状肾癌 1例 ,囊性肾癌 1例。术后平均随访 4 4 .7个月 ,肿瘤复发 1例 ,复发率为 4 .3%。 1年、3年无瘤生存率分别为 10 0 % (2 3/ 2 3)、93.8% (15 / 16 )。随访期间未出现肾功能衰竭而需透析治疗者。结论 :孤立肾或对侧肾功能不全的早期肾癌 ,是施行保留肾单位手术的绝对指征 ,在最大限度保留肾功能的前提下可以获得与根治性肾切除相似的疗效。 Objective:To assess the clinical value of nephron sparing surgery for the treatment of early stage renal cell carcinoma.Method:We reviewed the clinical data of 23 cases, who underwent nephron sparing surgery for early stage renal cell carcinoma from October 1996 to October 2002 in our hospital. These patients had solitary or abnormal contralateral kidney.Result:No severe complication related to the procedure was observed. The pathological stage was T1a in all patients. 19 were clear cell renal carcinoma, 2 were chromophobe cell renal carcinoma, 1 was papillary renal cell carcinoma and 1 was cystic renal cell carcinoma. The median follow up was 44.7 months. No patient progressed to renal failure, only one recurred and total recurrence rate was 4.3 %. The cancer specific 1 and 3 year survival rate was 100% and 93.8 %, respectively.Conclusion:Early stage renal cell carcinoma with solitary or abnormal contralateral kidney is the imperative indication of nephron sparing surgery. The effect of this surgery was as the same as that of radical nephrectomy.
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2004年第2期65-66,共2页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 肾肿瘤 外科手术 Renal neoplasms Surgery,operative
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1[1]Guinan P, Sbin L H, Algaba F, et al. TNM staging of renal cell carcinoma. Cancer, 1997, 80:180-182.
  • 2[2]Lerner S E , Hawkins C A, Blute M L, et al. Disease outcome in patients with low stage renal cell carcinoma treated with nephron sparing or radical surgery. J Urol, 1996, 155:1868-1873.
  • 3[3]Lee C T, Katz J, Shi W, et al. Surgical management of renal tumors 4 cm or less in a contemporary cohort. J Urol, 2000, 163:730-736.
  • 4[4]Lau W K, Blute M L, Weaver A L, et al. Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy vs nephron-sparing surgery in patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney. Mayo Clin Proc, 2000, 75:1236-1242.
  • 5[5]Delakas D, Karyotis I, Daskalopoulos G, et al. Nephron-sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma with a normal contralateral kidney: a European three-center experience. Urology, 2002, 60:998-1002.
  • 6[6]Harmon W J, Kavoussi L, Bishoff J T. Laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery for solid renal masses using the ultrasonic shears. Urology, 2000, 56:754-759.
  • 7[7]Junker K, Thrum K, Schlichter A, et al. Clonal origin of multifocal renal cell carcinoma as determined by microsatellite analysis. J Urol, 2002, 168:2632-2636.
  • 8[8]Castilla E A, Liou L S, Abrahams N A, et al. Prognostic importance of resection margin width after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma. Urology, 2002, 60:993-997.
  • 9[9]Piper N Y, Bishoff J T, Magee C, et al. Is a 1-CM margin necessary during nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma? Urology, 2001, 58:849-852.
  • 10[10]Sutherland S E, Resnick M I, Maclennan G T, et al. Does the size of the surgical margin in partial nephrectomy for renal cell cancer really matter? J Urol, 2002, 167:61-64.

同被引文献26

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部