期刊文献+

罪刑法定视野中的刑法合宪审查 被引量:36

On the Constitutional Review of the Criminal Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 刑法合宪审查是实现刑事法治、推进宪政进程的重要方面。刑法合宪审查应当以罪刑法定原则为立足基点。现代罪刑法定原则不仅具有传统的法外入罪禁止机能 ,而且能够延伸出崭新的法内出罪正当化解释机能。我国 97刑法具有“中国特色”的罪刑法定原则扭曲了现代罪刑法定的价值旨趣 ,导致了我国刑法合宪审查的机能缺损。只有在真正确认已成国际共识话语的现代罪刑法定原则、赋予其法外入罪禁止与出罪正当化解释双重机能 ,同时改革与完善人民代表大会制度 ,才能建构有效的刑法合宪审查机制。 The constitutional review of the criminal law is an important aspect of realizing criminal constitutionality and promoting the development of constitutionalism. The modern principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime prohibits punishment without merits and explains the legitimate of punishment within merits. The principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime in the 1997 Criminal Law has distorted the value orientation of modern principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime and lead to the functional drawbacks of constitutional review of criminal law. In order to establish an effective constitutional review of criminal law system, the system of People's representatives shall be reformed and perfected and the modern principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime shall be really reaffirmed.
作者 梁根林
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《法律科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第1期19-30,共12页 Law Science (Journal of Northwest Institute University of Politics and Law)
关键词 罪刑法定原则 刑法 合宪审查制 人民代表大会制度 宪政 中国 1997年 constitutionality principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime constitutional review of criminal law
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1季卫东.合宪性审查与司法权的强化[J].中国社会科学,2002(2):4-16. 被引量:125
  • 2[3]Joshua Dressler, Understanding Criminal Law, Matthew Bender & Company Incorporated, 1994, P19- 24.
  • 3[5][德]汉斯·海因里希·耶塞克,等.德国刑法教科书[M].徐久生.北京:中国法制出版社,2001.
  • 4[意]杜里奥·帕多瓦尼 陈忠林.意大利刑法学原理[M].北京:法律出版社,1998..
  • 5[7]Roberts v. Louisiana, 428 U.S. 325 (1976), Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 (1976).
  • 6[8]Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 (1977),Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978).
  • 7[9]Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978), Bell v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 637 (1978).
  • 8[10]Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 (1976): Mandatory death penalty laws declared unconstitutional. See also Roberts v. Louisiana, 428 U.S. 325 (1976).
  • 9[11]The Supreme Court Set to Review Alaska's Megan's Law, http://www. epic. org/privacy/meganslaw.
  • 10[12]Megan's Law: Connecticut's Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Law, http://www. smith-lawfirm.com/registration. html

二级参考文献92

共引文献180

同被引文献400

引证文献36

二级引证文献338

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部