期刊文献+

厌气混合培养中产甲烷菌和硫酸盐还原菌的动力学竞争 Ⅱ.动力学推定的结果及讨论 被引量:10

Kinetic Competition Between Methanogenic and Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria in Anaerobic Mixed Cultures Ⅱ. Results and Discussion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据前文建立的动力学模型及批量实验结果,进行了包括乙酸及氢气利用在内的MPB和SRB的动力学常数的推定。结果显示,以Methanothrix及Methanobacter为种属的乙酸和氢气利用MPB;以Desulfobacter postageix和Desulfovibrior为种属的乙酸和氢气利用SRB分别存在于葡萄糖消化过程中。在反映现实情况的低浓度硫酸根离子条件下,热力学及动力学均占优势的乙酸利用SRB相反完全竞争不过乙酸利用MPB。这是由于对硫酸根离子乙酸利用SRB竞争不过氢气利用SRB的缘故,因为后者(Kg=10.7-13.3 mg/L)具有比前者(Ks=19.5-21.4mg/L)更高的硫酸根离子亲合性。这一结果进一步显示有必要重新评价长久以来一直承担负面角色的SRB的作用。因为如果从有利于厌气过程中甲烷主要产生者-乙酸利用MPB的生长这一角度来看,适量生长的氢气利用SRB能够完全抑止作为对手的乙酸利用SRB的生长以至发挥重大的正面作用。另外,该研究提供的动力学推定方法能简便、快速、准确的推定出微生物菌体浓度和诸动力学常数,对于生物处理的近乎所有过程都具有参考价值。 The estimated kinetic parameters showed that Methanothrix, Methanobacter, Desulfobacter postagei and Desulfovibrio like MPB and SRB were presented during the glucose degradation process. The SRB cannot out-compete MPB for acetate at low concentration of sulfate. This was due to the acetate-utilizing SRB cannot out-compete the hydrogen-utilizing SRB for sulfate, because the latter has a higher (Ks = 10.7 - 13.3 mg/L) affinity than former (19.5 - 21.4 mg/L) for sulfate. It reveals that the hydrogen-utilizing SRB is obviously favorable for acetate-utilizing MPB to out-grew the acetate-utilizing SRB and have been believed to play a critical role in a practical methanogenic process.
出处 《中山大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2004年第1期92-97,共6页 Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni
基金 香港RGC资助项目
关键词 产甲烷菌(MPS) 硫酸盐还原菌(SRB) 微生物菌体浓度 厌气混合培养 动力学模型 动力学常数 methane-producing bacteria ( MPB) sulfate-reducing bacteria ( SRB) bacterial mass concentration anaerobic mixed culture kinetic parameter
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1[1]MCCARTY P L, SMITH D P. Anaerobic wastewater treatment[J]. Environ Sci Tech, 1986, 20(12): 1200 -1206.
  • 2[2]SPEECE R E. Anaerobic biotechnology for the industrial wastewater treatment[J]. Environ Sci Tech, 1983, 17(9):416 - 427.
  • 3[3]WIDDET F, PFENNIG N. A new anaerobic, sporing,acetate-oxidizing, sulfate-reducing bacterium, desulfotomaculum (emend) acetoxidans [ J ]. Arch Microbiol, 1977,122:119- 122.
  • 4[4]BADZIONG W, THAUER R K. Growth yields and growth rates of desulfovibrio vulgaris (Marburg) growing on hydrogen plus sulfate and hydrogen plus thiosulfate as the sole energy sources[J] .Arch Microbiol, 1978, 117: 209-214.
  • 5[5]INGVORSEN K, ZEHNDER A J B, JORGENSEN B B.Kinetics of sulfate and acetate uptake by desulfobacter postgatei[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1984, 47: 403-408.
  • 6[6]ROBINSON J A, TIEDJE J M. Competition between sulfatereduction and methanogenic bacteria for H2 under resting and growing conditions[J]. Arch Microbiol, 1984, 137:26- 32.
  • 7[7]YODA M, KITAGAWA M, MIYAJI Y. Long term competition between sulfate-reducing and methaneproducing bacteria for acetate in anaerobic biofilm[J]. Wat Res, 1987,21: 1547 - 1556.
  • 8[8]YANG S T, OKOS M R. Kinetic study and mathematical modeling of methanogenesis of acetate using pure cultures of methanogens[J]. Botech. Bioengrg. 1987,30:661 - 667.
  • 9[9]JIA X S, FANG H H P. Methanogenic characteristics of formate-utilizing sludge [J]. J Environmental Engineering,1999, 125(7) :596- 601.
  • 10[10]IA X S, FURUMAI H, FANG H H P. Extracellular polymers of hydrogen-utilizing methanogenic and sulfatereducing sludges[J]. Wat Res,1996, 30: 1439- 1444.

共引文献6

同被引文献192

引证文献10

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部