期刊文献+

西方效率理论的发展与政府的微观经济角色 被引量:4

The Development of Efficiency Theory and The Government's Microeconomic Role
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在新古典经济学中 ,完全竞争模型及其所确定的理想的配置效率状态 ,成为判断政府微观干预的根本标准。X效率理论和动态效率理论的发展 ,开始突破了配置效率的狭隘观念。现代奥地利学派则从市场是一个知识 (信息 )发现过程的视角 ,提出通功易事的概念 ,指出新古典意义上的经济无效率并不是政府干预的必要条件。对于政府来说 ,重要的不是去追求 (对于单个经济主体具有重要性的 )经济效率 ,而是要为经济主体追求经济效率创造良好的制度条件 ,即为通功易事提供便利。 In new classical economics,the Complete Competition Model(CCM) and ideal allocative efficiency are ultimate criterion of justifying the government's micro-economic intervention. The development of the X-efficiency theory and the dynamic efficiency theory has broken through the narrow perception.From the perspective of market as an information (knowledge) discovery process, the modern Austrian school put forward the concept of Catallactic Efficiency, and they notice that new classical economic inefficiency is not a necessary condition for the governments's intervention.It is important for the government not to pursue Robinsian economic or allocative efficiency,but to create institutional conditions for economic entity's pursuing economic efficiency,i.e.to facilitate Catallaxy.
作者 刘志铭
出处 《广东行政学院学报》 2003年第4期48-52,60,共6页 Journal of Guangdong Institute of Public Administration
关键词 配置效率 X效率 动态效率 通功易事效率 allocative efficiency X-efficiency dynamic efficiency Catallactic Efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1CORDATO.R.E.WelfareEconomicsandExternalitiesinanOpenEndedUniverse:AnAustrianPerspective[M ][]..1992
  • 2DEMSETZ·H.Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint[].Journal of Law and Economics.1969
  • 3LEIBENSTEIN·H.Allocative Efficiency VS X- Effiency[].The American Economist.1996
  • 4ALCHIAN·A.Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory[].Journal of Politics.1995
  • 5KIRZNER·I. M.Competition and Entrepreneurship[]..1973

同被引文献55

引证文献4

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部