期刊文献+

亚里士多德与墨子政治哲学比较研究

A Comparative Research in the Political Philosophy Between Aristotles and Moze
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从政治哲学角度考察,亚里士多德认为政治权力源于人性中的自然和伦理本性及其逻辑展开,墨子则把天作为权力的合法源头;亚氏把权力性善作为其合法性基础,墨子则认为权力的本质应当是服务;虽然他们都强调公共权力应优先分配给优秀者,但亚氏优秀的标准是忠诚和才干,而墨子则认为是爱人和服从。 There were many differences in politics between Aristotles and Moze from the view of political philosophy. Aristotles said that the political power originated from the natural and ethical essence in human nature and its logic development. Moze took it as Heaven; Aristotles considered the nature of power was goodness, Moze took it ought to serve the people; Both of them agreed to distribute the political power to the excellent men, Aristotles took the standards of excellence was royal and talent, but Moze took it as love (people) and obey (authority).
作者 林振武
机构地区 嘉应学院政法系
出处 《齐鲁学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第5期31-34,共4页 Qilu Journal
关键词 权力来源 合法性 分配 亚里士多德 墨子 the origin of power legality distribution Aristotles Moze
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1颜一.亚里士多德选集:政治学卷[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999.
  • 2孙诒让.墨子间诂[M].石家庄:河北人民出版社影印世界书局诸子集成本,1986.41,284.
  • 3易白沙.述墨[J].青年杂志,1915,1.
  • 4[美]麦金太尔.谁之正义?何种合理性[M].北京:当代中国出版社,1996.
  • 5苗力田.亚里士多德选集:伦理学卷[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999.
  • 6[德]黑格尔 范扬 等译.法哲学原理[M].北京:商务印书馆,1961..
  • 7[法]卢梭.社会契约论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997..
  • 8世界近代史参考资料[Z].北京:高等教育出版社,1987.
  • 9中国哲学史资料选辑:近代之部下[Z].北京:中华书局,1983.
  • 10.马克思恩格斯选集·第三卷[M].人民出版社,1995.305.

共引文献124

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部