摘要
"空椅危机"根源于两种欧洲观的直接冲突,本质上是共同体内超国家主义与政府间主义正面交锋的结果,实际发端于无果而终的"福歇计划"。从一定意义上来看,"福歇计划"的提出与搁浅、英国第一次入盟申请的否决、法德条约的签订都是"空椅危机"无法分割的组成部分。委员会1965年3月扩大欧洲议会与委员会权力的建议只是加速了危机发展的实际进程,即使没有委员会的扩权建议,法国与其他成员国及共同体超国家组织间的正面冲突也在所难免。
The crisis of 196566 was originally caused by the direct clash between supranationalism and intergovernmentalism, and actually started as early as the Fouchet Plan was voted down. The death of the Fouchet Plan, the failure of the British first application to join the common market, the treaty signed by West Germany and France are, in some way, the indispensable parts of the crisis of 196566.It is believed that if there hadn't been the March proposal by the committee, a facetoface conflict between France and the other member countries would have been unavoidable. The committee's proposal, to some extent, only speeded up the crisis.
出处
《信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2003年第5期114-117,120,共5页
Journal of Xinyang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
空椅危机
福歇计划
委员会建议
权力
冲突
Empty Chair Crisis
the Fouchet Plan the committee's proposal power conflict