期刊文献+

从SARS防治看突发公共卫生事件的信息管制与成效 被引量:7

Information Management of Public Health Emergencies in SARS Crisis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 了解SARS期间各主要信息源发布信息的时效性、科学性及成效 ,为健全我国公共卫生及信息体系的信息收集、识别和发布系统提供决策参考。 方法 系统收集 2 0 0 3年全年SARS的各种相关信息 ,来源于Medline、CBMdisc和Cochrane图书馆光盘数据库 ;WHO、中国卫生部和美国CDC等官方网站 ;新浪、搜狐、雅虎 (中国 )等民间网站 ;11种中文杂志和其他灰色文献 ,并根据信息的科学性将证据分级 ,结合时效性进行分析。 结果 共收集相关信息 1195 5条。民间网站信息量最大 (占 4 6 .7% ) ;信息的科学性按手检杂志、Medline、灰色文献、CBMdisc、官方网站和民间网站递降 ;时效性按官方网站、民间网站、杂志和数据库递减。官方网站和数据库中的中文信息分别占 71.8%和 6 5 %。 结论 中国SARS信息对全球SARS信息发布的贡献突出 ,信息量和时效性均佳 ,但信息管制和深度加工还需加强。 Objective To investigate the a ccurateness and rapidity of information on SARS , and to provide evidence for de cision-making in the construction of the public health information system of Ch ina, including information collection, identification and release. M ethods SARS related information was systematically collec te d, from ① databases including Medline, CBMdisc and Cochrane Library; ② officia l websites including WHO, MOH and CDC; ③ non-governmental websites including S ina, Sohu, Yahoo; ④ eleven Chinese Journals and ⑤ gray literatures, These evid ence were graded based on their scientific sense, and were analyzed according to their rapidity of release. Results A total of 11 955 pieces of related information were collected. Non-governmental websites were the agents that released the largest number of information (46.7%). Regardi ng the scientific sense of evidence, hand searched journal was at the top of the evidence pyramid, and followed by Medline, gray literature, CBMdisc, official a nd non-governmental websites. Regarding the rapidity, official website achieved the most rapid information release, which was followed by nongovernmental websi te, journal, and database. 71.8 percent of information from official websites wa s in Chinese, while 65 percent was from database. Conclusion The SARS information from China has contributed enormously to the g l obal information release. Although the amount and rapidity of the informa tion were satisfied, management and deep processing of information should be imp roved.
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2004年第2期122-128,共7页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金 科技部软科学研究项目基金资助 基金编号 :2 0 0 3DGQ3B167~~
关键词 SARS 防治措施 突发公共卫生事件 信息管制 循证医学 SARS Information analysis Evidence-ba sed medicine Public health emergencies
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献15

  • 1[1]WHO. Cumulative number of reported probable cases of SARS[EB/OL]. http://ww. who. int./csr/sars/country/2003-06-24/en/, accessed on June 25, 2003.中国卫生部:全国内地非典型肺炎疫情通报,http:∥www.moh. gov. cn/zhgl/ygtb/inde. htm ,accessed on June 25, 2003.
  • 2[5]Marra MA, Jones SJM, Astell CR, et al. The genome Sequence of the SARS-Associated Coronavirus. [ J ] Science, 2003; 300( 5624 ): 1399-1404.
  • 3[6]Rota PA, Oberste MS, Monroe SS, et al. Characterization of a novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome [ J ]. Science, 2003; 300 (5624): 1394-1399.
  • 4[7]Drosten C, Gunther S, Preiser W, et al. Identification of a Novel Coronavirus in Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome[J]. N Engl J Med, 2003; 348(20) :1957-1976.
  • 5[8]Peiris J, Lai S, Poon L, Guan Y, et al. Coronavirns as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome [ J ].Lancet, 2003; 361 (9371) :1319-1325.
  • 6[13]Zhang JP. Experience of Differentiating and treating SARS by Traditional Chinese Medicine[J]. Tianjin Journal of traditional Chinese medicine Special Papers for SARS, 2003; 20 ( 3 ):22-25.张军平SARS的中医辩证治疗体会[J].天津中医药.非典专辑2003;20(3):22-25.
  • 7[14]Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes R, et al. Empirical evidence of bias[J]. Journal of American Medical Association, 1995; 273(5) :408-412.
  • 8[15]WHO. Case Definitions for Surveillance of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) [EB/OL]. http://www. who.int/csr/sars/en/2003 年 5 月 27 日更新
  • 9[16]Clarke M, Oxman AD, Cochrane Reviewers Handbook 4. 1 In:Review Manager(RevMan). Update June 2000. Version4. 1,The Cochrane Collaboration: Oxford. England.
  • 10[26]Brain SE, Andrew P. Treatment allocation,the size of trials and reporting results [ M ]. In: Brain SE. , Andrew P. Editor-inchief. Statistical aspects of the design and analysis of clinical trials. London: Imperial College Press, 1999. 18-33.

共引文献44

同被引文献82

引证文献7

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部