期刊文献+

论先买权若干问题 被引量:2

Some Problems on Preemption
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国现行法缺少先买权普遍适用的一般性规定,与先买权有关的许多问题尚不明确。先买权应为物权取得权,依是否有对抗第三人的效力,可以分为物权先买权和债权先买权。我国制定物权法时,应把物权先买权作为特殊物权加以规定。 Current law in our state is in want of a general provision that universally suitable for preemption, and many issues related without any definite explanation. In this article, the author argues that preemption should be the rights to obtain the rights of property. According to the effects to the third person, preemption could be classified as preemption of rights of property and preemption of rights for creditor's rights. The author suggest that when draw up law of rights of property in our country, preemption of rights of property should be provided as a kind of special rights of property. In addition, the author also discusses the exercise of preemption and the arrangement of preemption.
作者 李敬从
出处 《淮阴师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2003年第5期639-643,共5页 Journal of Huaiyin Teachers College(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 先买权 法定先买权 约定先买权 先买权顺位 Preemption legal preemption contractual preemption preemption arrangement
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献22

  • 1王福祥.论优先购买权[J].法制与社会发展,1995,1(2):37-41. 被引量:36
  • 2邱本,崔建远.论私法制度与社会发展[J].天津社会科学,1995(3):52-57. 被引量:37
  • 3崔建远.合同法[M].北京:法律出版社,1998..
  • 4王利明 崔建远.合同法新论·总则[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1997..
  • 5瑞士民法681条第三款.
  • 6台湾土地法第104条,第二款.
  • 7德国民法第1100条、1102条.
  • 8潘维和.先买权之研究[A].刁荣华.现代民法基本问题[C].台湾:汉林出版社,1981.171-178.
  • 9Ovliver W. Holmes. The Common Law[M] . Boston, 1923. 1,
  • 10扬立新.疑难民事纠纷司法对策(第二集)[C].长春:吉林人民出版社,1994.333—335.

共引文献64

同被引文献21

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部