激进女权主义法学:看待法律的另一个视角

Radical Feminist Jurisprudence: Another Angle Considering Law

作为后现代法学分支的激进女权主义法学,认为法学宏大理论的建构者把法律定位为理性这一信念,与一个把男性看作理性代表者的社会习俗,实质上支撑了男性歧视的阴谋,使法学理论成了压抑女权的话语。激进女权主义法学的这一见解,瓦解了法律的普遍性原理,否定了理性个人作为自治的法律主体的存在,对法律的中立性原则提出了挑战,促使法学研究者从一个不同的视角来审视法律。但同时,以后现代理论为支撑和启迪的激进女权主义法学在自身理论上也存在许多问题。

The viewpoint that juristical grand theory establishers regarding law as rational, and the social convention treating the male as the radical spokesman, in the idea of the Radical Feminist Jurisprudence which is a part of the Postmodern Jurisprudence, in fact support the male discrimination plot. Therefore legal theory becomes the word oppressing female. This opinion overthrows the legal universal rule and denies the existence of the radical individual as automatic legal main body. It sets challense to the legal neutral principle, and makes the legal investigators survey the law from a different angle. But the Radical Feminist Jurisprudence by way of Postmodern Jurisprudence as sustain and edification has many problems in its own theory.