期刊文献+

CD44v6和PCNA在肾透明细胞癌的表达及其预后价值 被引量:1

CD44v6 and PCNA expression and its prognostic value in clear cell renal cell carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨CD4 4v6和PCNA与肾透明细胞癌 (CCRCC)分级、分期和预后的关系 ,以及两者相互之间的关系。方法 采用免疫组化技术检测 5 8例CCRCC标本中CD4 4v6和PCNA的表达 ,比较两者同Fuhrman分级、病理分期和预后的关系 ,以及两者相互之间的关系。结果 CD4 4v6表达阳性率为 4 4 .8% (2 6 / 5 8) ,为细胞膜染色 ;PCNA表达阳性率为 5 6 .9% (33/ 5 8) ,为细胞核染色。两者表达与分级 (P <0 .0 0 1)和患者生存率 (P <0 .0 1和P <0 .0 5 )均显著相关 ,与病理分期无关 (P >0 .0 5 )。两者相互之间亦无关 (P >0 .0 5 )。结论 CD4 4v6和PCNA表达可能在CCRCC进展中发挥作用 。 Objective To examine the expression of CD44 isoform v6( CD44v6) and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) and assess the association of its expression with Fuhrman grade, pTNM stage and prognostic value, as well as their relationship with each other. Methods A retrospective analysis of 58 patients was undertaken. These patients had undergone a radical or partial nephrectomy in our hospital between 1989 and 2000. Immunohistochemical testing was performed by the Envision method using a monoclone mouse antibody (VEF 7 or PC10). Staining characteristics were compared with the clinicopathological results. Results Of the 58 primary tumour specimens, immunohistochemistry showed that 26 tumours (44.8%) expressed CD44v6 which was localized in the cell membrane and 33(56.9%) PCNA in the nucleus. Statistical analysis showed that CD44v6 or PCNA expression was significantly correlated with the Fuhrman grade ( P < 0.001 ) but not with pTNM stage ( P > 0.05 ). There was no correlation between CD44v6 expression and PCNA expression ( P >0.05). The prognosis for CCRCC patients who were CD44v6 or PCNA positive was worse than for patients who were CD44v6 or PCNA negative ( P < 0.01 and 0.05, respectively). Conclusion CD44v6 or PCNA may play a role in the progression of CCRCC, and thus the analysis of CD44v6 or PCNA expression may provide useful prognostic information.
出处 《现代泌尿外科杂志》 CAS 2004年第1期12-14,共3页 Journal of Modern Urology
关键词 CD44V6 PCNA 肾透明细胞癌 表达 预后 CD44v6 PCNA immunohistochemistry renal cell carcinoma prognostic factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1[1]Belldegrum A, de Kernion JB. Renal tumors [A]. Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, eds. Campbells Urology [M]. Vol 3.17th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1998. 2283-2326.
  • 2[2]Guinan P, Sobin LH, Algaba F, et al. TNM staging of renal cell carcinoma: workgroup No.3 [J]. Cancer, 1997, 80(5):992-993.
  • 3[3]Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma [J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 1982, 6(7): 655-663.
  • 4[4]Li N, Tshji M, Kanda K, et al. Analysis of CD44 isoform v10 expression and its prognostic value in renal cell carcinoma [J]. Br J Urol, 2000, 85(4):514-518.
  • 5[5]Rudzki JS. CD44s and the adhesion of neoplastic cells [J]. J Clin Pathol Mod Pathol, 1997, 50(1):57-71.
  • 6[6]De Alava E, Panizo A, Sola I, et al. CD44v6 expression is related to progression in renal epithelial tumours [J]. Histopathology, 1998, 33(1):39-45.
  • 7[7]Paradis V, Ferlicot S, Ghannam E, et al. CD44 is an independent prognostic factor in conventional renal cell carcinomas [J]. J Urol, 1999, 161(6):1984-1987.
  • 8[8]Gilcrease MZ, Guzman-Paz M, Niehans G, et al. Correlation of CD44s expression in renal clear cell carcinomas with subsequent tumor progression or recurrence [J]. Cancer, 1999, 86(11):2320-2326.
  • 9[9]Daniel L, Lechevallier E, Giorgi R, et al. CD44s and CD44v6 expression in localized T1-T2 conventional renal cell carcinomas [J]. J Pathol, 2001,193(3):345-349.
  • 10[10]Fischer C, Georg C, Kraus S, et al. CD44s, E-cadherin and PCNA as markers for progression in renal cell carcinoma [J]. Anticancer Res,1999,19(2c):1513-1517.

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部