期刊文献+

“非典”时期京渝两地民众社会心理特征比较研究 被引量:7

The Comparison of The Socio-Psychological Characteristics of the People between Beijing and Chongqing When SARS Happened
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用分层抽样的问卷调查方法,对京渝两地的556名民众进行了"非典"疫情中风险认知及其社会心理行为预测指标的研究。结果表明:(1)"非典"期间,两地民众的社会心理总的趋势上具有一致性,他们在风险事件的认知、影响风险认知的信息因素和社会心理预警指标几方面总体表现是正常和适度的。调查期间政府的防控措施对稳定民众心理起到了重要作用;(2)"非典"期间,处在不同疫情状态下的两地民众的社会心理也存在一些明显的差异。这些差异主要是因所处的不同疫情环境而引起的,而且也仅是程度上的而非性质上的。本调查结果可为我国突发性公共卫生事件的有效防控和民众心理行为的有效疏导提供对策建议,为未来建立我国民众社会心理行为预警系统提供理论和方法依据。 To investigate Chinese peoples' risk perception of SARS and the socio-psychological predictive indication,the research workers surveyed 556 people in Beijing and Chongqing by the method of stratified sampling. The results indicated that: (1)When SARS happened in China, the general distribution of the peoples' socio-psychological is consistent between Beijing and Chongqing, and the Peoples' risk perception, influence factor and socio-psychological presentiment indication was normal and moderate in overall. The prevent and control demarche of the government played a significant role for peoples' psychological stabilization. (2)There were some significant differences between two cities because different plague state and environment .these differences was not attribution but degree. (3)Our research results could be used by future leaders as the basis of burst sanitarian disaster prevent and socio-psychological direction efficiently, as well as they offered important information for socio-psychological presentiment indication system .
作者 时勘 张进辅
出处 《西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第2期53-57,共5页 Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
基金 教育部社会科学人文基地重大项目"变革时期领导行为研究"(02JAZJD630002)国家自然科学基金项目"'非典'时期我国民众的社会心理特征及预警研究"(70340002)重庆市十五哲学社会科学规划课题"维护社会稳定的社会心理分析与引导研究
关键词 “非典” 社会心理 风险认知 社会心理预警 SARS socio-psychology risk perception socio-psychological predictive
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1谢晓非.风险研究中的若干心理学问题[J].心理科学,1994,17(2):104-108. 被引量:18
  • 2时勘,卢嘉.管理心理学的现状与发展趋势[J].应用心理学,2001,7(2):52-56. 被引量:26
  • 3[1]Herbert A S. Rationality in psychology and economics. Journal of Business, 1986, 59 (4): S209~224
  • 4[2]Kahneman D, Tversky A. The simulation heuristic. In: Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, eds. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982. 201~208
  • 5[3]Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science, 1987, 236: 280~285
  • 6[4]Atman C J, Bostrom A, Fischhoff B, et al. Designing risk communications: Completing and correcting mental models of hazardous processes (part 1). Risk Analysis, 1994, 14: 779~788
  • 7[5]Webmaster T. A socio-psychological model for analyzing risk communication processes. The Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies, 2000, 2: 150~166
  • 8[6]Vlek C, Stallen P. Rational and personal aspects of risk. ACTA Psychologique, 1981, 45: 275~300
  • 9[7]Douglas M, Wildavsky A. Risk and Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982
  • 10[8]Banks M H, Clegg C W, Jackson R R, et al. The use of the general health questionaire as an indicator of mental health in occupational studies. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 1980, 53: 187~194

共引文献81

同被引文献96

引证文献7

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部