摘要
Conficius’ Theories on Poetry and The Prologue To Mao Poetry are different in their ideas of application of poetry, which leads to their different fashions of analyzing poems. For one thing, the former analyzes poems within poems, while the latter does beyond. For another, the former is an apparent fashion of handling the affection and aspiration in poems, while the latter is a hidden fashion. All the explainers of The Book of Songs have misread The Prologue To Mao Poetry that analyze poems beyond poems, and believed it explained poems within poems. This misreading has resulted in the debate on whether to honor The Prologue To Mao Poetry or abandon it in the learning history of The Book of Songs .
Conficius’ Theories on Poetry and The Prologue To Mao Poetry are different in their ideas of application of poetry, which leads to their different fashions of analyzing poems. For one thing, the former analyzes poems within poems, while the latter does beyond. For another, the former is an apparent fashion of handling the affection and aspiration in poems, while the latter is a hidden fashion. All the explainers of The Book of Songs have misread The Prologue To Mao Poetry that analyze poems beyond poems, and believed it explained poems within poems. This misreading has resulted in the debate on whether to honor The Prologue To Mao Poetry or abandon it in the learning history of The Book of Songs .
出处
《武汉大学学报(人文科学版)》
CSSCI
2003年第5期597-602,共6页
Wuhan University Journal (Humanity Sciences)
关键词
《孔子诗论》
《毛诗序》
用《诗》观
说诗方式
尊序废序之争
Conficius’ Theories on Poetry
The Prologue To Mao Poetry
ideas of application of poetry
fashions of analyzing poems