期刊文献+

三种途径子宫切除术的临床观察 被引量:7

Clinical Observation of Hysterectomy Through Three Kinds of Approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】探讨开腹全子宫切除术 (TAH)、腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫全切术 (LAVH)和阴式子宫切除术(TVH)三种手术方法临床疗效的优缺点。【方法】对 10 4例子宫切除术的患者分别采用TAH ,LAVH ,TVH三种不同手术方法 ,然后统计其手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间、下床活动时间和术后住院天数。【结果】三种手术方法中手术时间、术后排气时间、下床活动时间和术后住院天数差异具有显著性 (P <0 .0 1)其中LAVH ,TVH为佳 ,而三种手术方法中术中出血量差异无显著性 (P >0 .0 5 )。【结论】LAVH和TVH安全性好、创伤小、病人痛苦少 ,术后恢复快 ,但应视病人具体情况做出选择。 Objectives]To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of therapeutic efficacy during application of three kinds of operative approaches ?trans-abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), laparoscopic assistant vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and trans-vaginal hysterectomy (TVH).Hysterectomies in one hundred and four patients were performed by three different approaches (TAH, LAVH and TVH), then their duration of operation, the hemorrhage quantity in operation, the time of air exhaust after operation, the time of ambulation and number of days in hospitalization were analyzed statistically.Significant differences existed in duration of operation, the time of air exhaust after operation, the time of ambulation and number of days in hospitalization among three approaches of hysterectomy (P<0.01), better therapeutic efficacy was obtained in LAVH and TVH. There were no obvious differences in hemorrhage quantity of operation among three approaches (P>0.05).[Conclusion]LAVH and TVH show several advantages , including good safety, less trauma, less pain and quick recovery ; but the choice of operation should be made according to the actual condition of patients.
出处 《医学临床研究》 CAS 2004年第2期143-145,共3页 Journal of Clinical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献9

  • 1Lepine LA, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, et al. Hysterectomy surveillance- United States, 1980 - 1993. Mor Mortal Wkly Rep CDC Surveill Summ, 1997,46( 1 ) :1.
  • 2Reich H,Decaprio J, McGlyn K. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg, 1989,5(4) :213.
  • 3Nwosu CR, Gupta JK. Abdominal, laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophoreetomy: a feasibility study for further evaluation in randomized trials. Surg Endose, 1999, 13(9) : 148.
  • 4Shao JB, Wong F. Factors influencing the choice of hysterectomy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol,2001,41(3) :303.
  • 5Hidlebaugh DA. Cost and quality-of-life issues associated with different surgical therapies for the treatment of abonormal uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am,2000,27(2) :451.
  • 6Young W, Cohen MM. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy- a review of current issues. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 1997,13(2) :368.
  • 7Lowell L, Kessler AA. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy- a suitable substitute for abdominal hysterectomy? J Reprod Med, 2000,45 (9) : 738.
  • 8Dersey JH, Earl PS, Holtz PM. Clinical indications for hysterectomy route: patient characteristics or physician preference. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1995,173(5) : 1452.
  • 9刘珠凤,郎景和,孙大为.阴式大子宫切除术25例临床分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,1999,34(8):456-458. 被引量:273

共引文献626

同被引文献12

引证文献7

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部